the Air Vent

Because the world needs another opinion

Blocked Again – Real Climate

Posted by Jeff Id on January 31, 2009

There will be no dissent. There will be no discussion of potential dissent and no independent consideration which may result in the potential for dissent.

These guys are going to turn me into a denier, it’s like they want me to be a denier, maybe I’m too dangerous to their plans. It will be their fault, they like Tamino are the ones who can’t have a reasonable discussion, or maybe my questions are too hard.

Check out this burner that I sent to them regarding the warming antarctic paper they are circularly celebrating.

I wonder if you know when the data and code for this will be released. If it has, where can I find it?

It doesn’t matter to me if the antarctic is warming or not, but I would like to know the details of this study. I’ve read the paper and SI and it isn’t exactly chock full of detail.

Eric Steig was on line answering other peoples questions at the time, he had to have seen my email but instead of answering, it was CUT, SNIPPED, CHOPPED, CENSORED AND BLOCKED.

Not my fault.

12 Responses to “Blocked Again – Real Climate”

  1. page48 said

    It seems obvious by now that they’re not going to let you play in their sandbox, but I think it’s admirable that you keep trying. Have a nice evening!

  2. peter vd berg said

    religious fanatics don’t take it well if you shake the foundation of their beliefs.I guess we just have ourselves a whole new religion. No point in discussing

  3. psi said

    Jeff–

    Keep asking the valid questions. That will always put you on the “real” side of climate or any other subject. Censorious fanatics may be able to temporarily create a self-inclosed world of collective delusion, but ultimately reality will come crashing in on them.

    Keep up your record of what happens as you persevere.

    In the end, the journey is our destination.

    Cheers,

    psi

  4. DJ said

    Jeff,

    I’ve come across this Title instead of using “Denier” use “Contrarian”. I’ve seen it used a number of times. It seems to have a certain “Ring” to it! What do you think? Keep up the great work.

    Regards,
    DJ

  5. Jeff Id said

    You’re right. But I don’t like contrarian, it sounds like the science of being continuously contrary. I like naturalist, they’re turning me into a climate naturalist.

  6. Tim L said

    I like climate Independent thinker.
    Jeff,
    there is another way to look at change AM and FM.
    most are looking at am but i think fm might be the way to go.
    H. W. CLOUGH

    http://docs.lib.noaa.gov/rescue/mwr/048/mwr-048-10-0593.pdf

    page 595 table 1
    you can see the period change from short to long and back.
    why is frequency modulation a good thing?
    it will mask out noise much better that average or second squares.
    Archibald was on to this with a start at peak on sun spots then end at minimum rather than count spots and average or conclude from am numbers.
    also, if the temps taken from UHI’s or moved stations will have less effect rounding errors gone.
    Thank you
    Tim

  7. The Diatribe Guy said

    “Climate naturalist.”

    I like it. I wish I had thought of it.

    Sign me up.

  8. Adam Gallon said

    They’re very selective in what questions they allow to be asked.
    Try drawing attention to their previous pronouncements on Antarctic temps, that cooling there is commesurate with Global Warming, http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/02/antarctica-is-cold/langswitch_lang/sk
    Try posting that “An Inconvenient Truth” has been tested in The High Court and found wanting,

    http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/corporate_law/article2633838.ece

    I notice they’ve a thread up about glaciers now, I think I’ll pop in a question about this article. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7580294.stm

  9. page48 said

    I like “Climate Rationalist,” myself.

  10. Vephurnerut said

    Maaaan, you know there is such thing in the web like search engine, http://google.com if you don’t, go there to understand why this post is bullshit

  11. Philip Thomas said

    Climate Realist is muy prefered term.

  12. Schrodinger's Cat said

    I guess that they don’t want objective science to interfere with their subjective propaganda.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers

%d bloggers like this: