Posted by Jeff Condon on February 21, 2010
Certainly the link below is not the most honest title I’ve ever read but we’re supposedly the denialists right?
I’m not sure what happened with this paper. If someone has a copy please send it to my email on the left. Either way one comment in the article caught my attention.
h/t Jon Rappoport and hjbange.
“Retraction is a regular part of the publication process,” he said. “Science is a complicated game and there are set procedures in place that act as checks and balances.”
Ah, I didn’t realize this was a ‘regular’ part of the process. So the steps in real science are now:
1- conclude result
2- collect data
3- remove denialist data
4- publish proof of conclusion.
6- press conference,
7- new funding
It’s to bad that Mann08 got stuck at step 6.