Compelling Argument For Libertarians Against the Bill of Rights

I have read many of the federalist papers, having determined to read them all at one point I started with the first and kept working away at it. At some point in the process, their length and complexity kept me from completion. Hamilton has always been one of my favorites and no 84 is copied below. I would like readers to take away several points from it. First, the intellectual level of the writing is well beyond what we find in today’s society even from the highest scholars in the most prestigious universities. The combinations of history, suggested declared rights and potential outcomes of such declarations would boggle the minds of most lawyers today, confuse most conservative thinkers and leave Democrats petting their cats.

Another point I would like readers to consider is that the argument made against the bill of rights is exactly what happened. Hamilton turned out to be correct over 200 years later.

Why for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretence for claiming that power.

We have an entire education system created by the federal government based on powers not granted. Readers here argued with me just a few months ago that the general welfare clause in the constitution allowed for the federal regulation of medical needs including the enforcement of particular medicines. Neither result is constitutional per the founders intent. This is a power not delegated and one argument made that despite the tenth amendment explicitly stating that powers not delegated are reserved to states or individuals, this presently observed usurpation of rights, is exactly what Hamilton said would happen. If you declare a specific right made, that implies other previously unstated rights don’t exist.

Hamilton was right.

A third point, and one highlighted at Citizen Free Press was that no law can be made after the fact and used to convict. This is an ancient practice prohibited by our constitution and used recently to convict President Trump of a fake crime and prevent his running for office.

Enjoy but plan a half hour —->>

Alexander Hamilton, Federalist, no. 84, 575–8128 May 1788

The most considerable of these remaining objections is, that the plan of the convention contains no bill of rights. Among other answers given to this, it has been upon different occasions remarked, that the constitutions of several of the states are in a similar predicament. I add, that New-York is of this number. And yet the opposers of the new system in this state, who profess an unlimited admiration for its constitution, are among the most intemperate partizans of a bill of rights. To justify their zeal in this matter, they alledge two things; one is, that though the constitution of New-York has no bill of rights prefixed to it, yet it contains in the body of it various provisions in favour of particular privileges and rights, which in substance amount to the same thing; the other is, that the constitution adopts in their full extent the common and statute law of Great-Britain, by which many other rights not expressed in it are equally secured.

To the first I answer, that the constitution proposed by the convention contains, as well as the constitution of this state, a number of such provisions.

Independent of those, which relate to the structure of the government, we find the following: Article I. section 3. clause 7. “Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honour, trust or profit under the United States; but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment, according to law.” Section 9. of the same article, clause 2. “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” Clause 3. “No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.” Clause [8]. “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the congress, accept of any present, emolument, office or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince or foreign state.” Article III. section 2. clause 3. “The trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury; and such trial shall be held in the state where the said crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any state, the trial shall be at such place or places as the congress may by law have directed.” Section 3, of the same article, “Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court.” And clause [2], of the same section. “The congress shall have power to declare the punishment of treason, but no attainder of treason shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture, except during the life of the person attainted.”

It may well be a question whether these are not upon the whole, of equal importance with any which are to be found in the constitution of this state. The establishment of the writ of habeas corpus, the prohibition of ex post facto laws, and of TITLES OF NOBILITY, to which we have no corresponding provisions in our constitution, are perhaps greater securities to liberty and republicanism than any it contains. The creation of crimes after the commission of the fact, or in other words, the subjecting of men to punishment for things which, when they were done, were breaches of no law, and the practice of arbitrary imprisonments have been in all ages the favourite and most formidable instruments of tyranny. The observations of the judicious Blackstone in reference to the latter, are well worthy of recital. “To bereave a man of life (says he) or by violence to confiscate his estate, without accusation or trial, would be so gross and notorious an act of despotism, as must at once convey the alarm of tyranny throughout the whole nation; but confinement of the person by secretly hurrying him to goal, where his sufferings are unknown or forgotten, is a less public, a less striking, and therefore a more dangerous engine of arbitrary government.” And as a remedy for this fatal evil, he is every where peculiarly emphatical in his encomiums on the habeas corpus act, which in one place he calls “the BULWARK of the British constitution.”

Nothing need be said to illustrate the importance of the prohibition of titles of nobility. This may truly be denominated the corner stone of republican government; for so long as they are excluded, there can never be serious danger that the government will be any other than that of the people.

To the second, that is, to the pretended establishment of the common and statute law by the constitution, I answer, that they are expressly made subject “to such alterations and provisions as the legislature shall from time to time make concerning the same.” They are therefore at any moment liable to repeal by the ordinary legislative power, and of course have no constitutional sanction. The only use of the declaration was to recognize the ancient law, and to remove doubts which might have been occasioned by the revolution. This consequently can be considered as no part of a declaration of rights, which under our constitutions must be intended as limitations of the power of the government itself.

It has been several times truly remarked, that bills of rights are in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgments of prerogative in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. Such was Magna Charta, obtained by the Barons, sword in hand, from king John. Such were the subsequent confirmations of that charter by subsequent princes. Such was the petition of right assented to by Charles the First, in the beginning of his reign. Such also was the declaration of right presented by the lords and commons to the prince of Orange in 1688, and afterwards thrown into the form of an act of parliament, called the bill of rights. It is evident, therefore, that according to their primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing, and as they retain every thing, they have no need of particular reservations. “We the people of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America.” Here is a better recognition of popular rights than volumes of those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our state bills of rights, and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics than in a constitution of government.

But a minute detail of particular rights is certainly far less applicable to a constitution like that under consideration, which is merely intended to regulate the general political interests of the nation, than to a constitution which has the regulation of every species of personal and private concerns. If therefore the loud clamours against the plan of the convention on this score, are well founded, no epithets of reprobation will be too strong for the constitution of this state. But the truth is, that both of them contain all, which in relation to their objects, is reasonably to be desired.

I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colourable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretence for claiming that power. They might urge with a semblance of reason, that the constitution ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority, which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication, that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it, was intended to be vested in the national government. This may serve as a specimen of the numerous handles which would be given to the doctrine of constructive powers, by the indulgence of an injudicious zeal for bills of rights.

On the subject of the liberty of the press, as much has been said, I cannot forbear adding a remark or two: In the first place, I observe that there is not a syllable concerning it in the constitution of this state, and in the next, I contend that whatever has been said about it in that of any other state, amounts to nothing. What signifies a declaration that “the liberty of the press shall be inviolably preserved?” What is the liberty of the press? Who can give it any definition which would not leave the utmost latitude for evasion? I hold it to be impracticable; and from this, I infer, that its security, whatever fine declarations may be inserted in any constitution respecting it, must altogether depend on public opinion, and on the general spirit of the people and of the government.1 And here, after all, as intimated upon another occasion, must we seek for the only solid basis of all our rights.

There remains but one other view of this matter to conclude the point. The truth is, after all the declamation we have heard, that the constitution is itself in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, A BILL OF RIGHTS. The several bills of rights, in Great-Britain, form its constitution, and conversely the constitution of each state is its bill of rights. And the proposed constitution, if adopted, will be the bill of rights of the union. Is it one object of a bill of rights to declare and specify the political privileges of the citizens in the structure and administration of the government? This is done in the most ample and precise manner in the plan of the convention, comprehending various precautions for the public security, which are not to be found in any of the state constitutions. Is another object of a bill of rights to define certain immunities and modes of proceeding, which are relative to personal and private concerns? This we have seen has also been attended to, in a variety of cases, in the same plan. Adverting therefore to the substantial meaning of a bill of rights, it is absurd to allege that it is not to be found in the work of the convention. It may be said that it does not go far enough, though it will not be easy to make this appear; but it can with no propriety be contended that there is no such thing. It certainly must be immaterial what mode is observed as to the order of declaring the rights of the citizens, if they are to be found in any part of the instrument which establishes the government. And hence it must be apparent that much of what has been said on this subject rests merely on verbal and nominal distinctions, which are entirely foreign from the substance of the thing.

Citizen Free Press Found this Beauty – Dan Rather Lying for the Climate Cabal in 1982

The “scientists” were claiming that sea level was rising at an ever increasing rate even way back in 1982 which is prior to the sea level satellite era and pre-internet for all intents and purposes. You can see the corruption of science clearly that this was a very false claim being made by the “scientists”.

They were fanatical liars even back then. The rate of sea level rise has not changed in response to human activity whatsoever. It didn’t in 1982 and it hasn’t since then either. Sea level is rising a little, but it was already rising before the airplane was invented and we tiny humans with our insanely powerful industries have STILL not been able to cause any detectable change in it whatsoever.

Anyone who says CO2 has altered sea level rise — is an unscientific liar selling you something else. AKA — FAKE news.

The lack of curvature in these graphs means that sea level has been doing the exact same thing since before the internal combustion engine was used. Widespread adaptation of cars, trucks, trains, aircraft, boats, coal power electric generation, gas electric generation, massive cement production, and cow farts have done precisely ZERO to the rate of sea level rise. The same rate has been going on for over a century and a half and likely will for the next century and a half.

Graphs like this —

Are not scientific. They are combined models and sea level with time based filters to make them appear continuous. The model data – red – is based on climate models which statistically over-predict warming and can be stated to have scientifically failed to represent the climate.

Below is the tide gauge data from the Virginia key which our scientists cherry picked this region from hundreds of tide gauge plots to find a microscopic uphook at 2010. Sea level rise in Florida is the same as anywhere else in the oceans, but you have a different ground level change as a baseline in different reasons. Remember, you can’t fill just one side of a glass and not the others so TRUE sea level rise is the same across the globe.

Here is another station really close by to Virginia Key

The scientists of climate change who blather about accelerating sea level rise, are charlatans living off the government teat and nothing else. As one published in this field a long time ago, I would be embarrassed were I one of them.

NOAA Sea Level Trends

I just wrote a huge post on sea level, only to have it deleted by wordpress’s terrible editor. Very frustrating – no caps for wordpress today.

The NOAA has a cool site where you can see sea level at each tide gauge. There is no curvature in the tide gauge data meaning that all global warming models have failed and this article:

Sea levels are starting to rise faster. Here’s how much South Florida is expecting

Is nothing but propaganda.

Here is an image from the NOAA site linked above:

Select an arrow and then select linear trend in the popup for your own graph of actual tide gauge data. Good luck finding curvature in the graphs as there is no change in sea level rise for all of recorded history.

Esteemed Doctor, Coincidence Theorist and Deputy Director of the NIH — Dr. Tabak

That is a lot of titles. The NIH has decided to provide a critical update to human mental software. If your mind is not running “Human Scatology version 30.1.2.17”, head immediately to the NIH home page press download to begin. ALERT: This is a critical update!!

So the NIH has now admitted to performing gain-of-function research at Wuhan lab in China. This research was performed under Trump’s watch and at the direction of Dr. Fauci by EcoHealth Alliance. This research was on bat corona virus and was being done using the exact same types of spike proteins and virus combinations as were discovered in the COVID 19 virus. Like 120,000 Democrat-only votes showing up in one location for the first time ever, we are now to believe that this is simply a coincidence that COVID 19 originated in Wuhan and had the same characteristic virus and spike protein combinations as the Gain-of-Function research performed in Wuhan, by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA in conjunction with CHINA. We are fully expected to keep in mind COVID 19 is still absolutely and assuredly of natural origin.

It depends on what your definition of “is” is.

It is only a coincidence that for YEARS, we were told it wasn’t gain-of-function research being done by Fauci and others, in sworn testimony!! We were called conspiracy theorists despite all evidence pointing to the man made development of this virus. Medicines which protected from the virus were withheld. Some folks right here at this site told me I didn’t know what I was talking about and somehow they knew better. What year is it now?

Yesterday we were told that the conspiracy is still a coincidence even though they admit to performing gain-of-function research on covid virus at the very location (and timeframe) that COVID 19 was released. Like vote fraud, one must consider how is it possible that such widespread knowledge in the medical world is not exposed outright across all government and media outlets globally. Below is from an application written by Daszak for EcoHealth Alliance in 2014 to build and test COVID 19 in Wuhan lab.

Specific Aim 3: Testing predictions of CoV inter-species transmission.  We will test our models of host range (i.e. emergence potential) experimentally using reverse genetics, pseudovirus and receptor binding assays, and virus infection experiments in cell culture and humanized mice. With bat-CoVs that we’ve isolated or sequenced, and using live virus or pseudovirus infection in cells of different origin or expressing different receptor molecules, we will assess potential for each isolated virus and those with receptor binding site sequence, to spill over.  We will do this by sequencing the spike (or other receptor binding/fusion) protein genes from all our bat-CoVs, creating mutants to identify how significantly each would need to evolve to use ACE2, CD26/DPP4 (MERS-CoV receptor) or other potential CoV receptors.  We will then use receptor-mutant pseudovirus binding assays, in vitro studies in bat, primate, human and other species’ cell lines, and with humanized mice where particularly interesting viruses are identified phylogenetically, or isolated. These tests will provide public health-relevant data, and also iteratively improve our predictive model to better target bat species and CoVs during our field studies to obtain bat-CoV strains of the greatest interest for understanding the mechanisms of cross-species transmission.

Dr Tabak, Deputy Director of the NIH gave testimony where he admitted the government performs gain of function research with the caveat that they do it all the time. As though there is ‘nothing to see here folks’. Then he adds for those of you still not paying attention, this research is not regulated because the research poses “NO THREAT OR HARM TO ANYBODY”. All part of the new human software download.

This research IS regulated BTW, just not well enough. That is a topic for another time however.

Watch Tabak dance for yourself right here — it’s a short video, even a gen Z could make it to the end.

So there it is Democrat sheople, now it is ok to believe in Gain of Function research in Wuhan lab, and despite using the same virus and spike proteins, during exactly the same timeframe as COVID 19, this research had nothing to do with COVID 19 whatsoever.

And it is completely harmless.

All this will make sense after you download your critical software update — “Human Scatology version 30.1.2.17”

Be well.

Fulton County Could Lose Over Ten Thousand Democrat Voters This Year

New rules implemented preclude certain types of vote fraud.

Georgia election officials have recently confirmed issues that occurred in Fulton County amid the November 2020 election, resulting in more oversight for the 2024 general election.

The Georgia State Election Board said on Tuesday that they found Fulton County had likely scanned more than 3,000 ballots twice during the 2020 presidential election recount, according to the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

JustTheNews

No signature verification was attempted in Fulton county as Mark Wingate of the BRE stated and no effective measures for signature validation were implemented anywhere else in the US as evidenced by the record low rejection rates of ballots. The reality is that signatures are not even remotely usable for accurate identification and the democrat push to allow signatures to be used as identification is only a cynical press to commit vote fraud. Unfortunately, the party of the low-IQ voter, was successful in this effort and one in five voters in a recent poll admitted that they had committed fraud using this new system.

The statistical anomalies I’ve pointed out here at the Air Vent have been proven out numerous ways. Video, cell data, obviously bad signatures, polls of voter behavior and witnesses with sworn affidavits among many other lines of corroborating evidence. Many counties have admitted to violations of election law during 2020 but none have thoroughly examined the true history of the ballots that were eventually counted.

There will absolutely be massive fraud in 2024. In Michigan 2022, the fraud was legally incorporated right into the constitution, ironically by using massive fraud to vote it in. Michigan will not be voting for a Republican president any time in the near future as the true voter opinion would need to be approximately ten points in Republican favor to overwhelm the fraud. Georgia has taken a few partial measures which will definitely cut into the Democrat fraud. It will be hilarious to hear the explanations for 50,000 ballots not showing up this time in single counties. The anti-fraud measures are partial so I expect a smaller change, but due to the huge republican population, Georgia is lost to the Democrats for 2024.

Wisconsin has implemented partial measures but the polling is very close. I believe Biden will win Wisconsin with the fraud and likely the election. Pennsylvania polling could bring Trump a win but the fraud is extremely heavy in this state. If Republicans can cut the fraud in half in Pennsylvania, Trump would win the election. The Democrats will be piling on the fake ballots so I expect massive fraud stories from this state, bigger than last time. Arizona is likely lost to Trump but the polling could overwhelm the fraud. Interestingly, some hard blue states don’t have need for the robust fraud teams and may fall off the Democrat wagon, spoiling the election for them.

A Little Common Sense Wouldn’t Hurt

I used to write that nearly the only thing between Democrat socialists and the NAZI socialists in terms of policy was that the Democrats didn’t hate Jews. Looks like the Democrats have cleaned that up for us rather nicely. Seriously though, there are very subtle and truly unimportant policy differences between these socialist governance platforms.

Health:
Fascism: public health was the ideal vehicle for strengthening international cooperation, because ‘no state wishes to become better than the others in preserving the health of its own people.
Socialism: a health care system in which the government owns and operates health care facilities and employs the health care .
communism: the government owned and ran all health care, and it was free to the people.
Democrat platform: Democrats have fought to achieve universal health care for a century. We are proud to be the party of Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act.

Business:
Fascism: A minimum wage. The state, through official cartels, controlled all aspects of manufacturing,
Socialism: Socialism is a populist economic and political system based on public ownership (also known as collective or common ownership) of the means of production.
Communism: economic decisions are made by the community as a whole.
Democrat platform: We should raise and index the minimum wage, give all Americans the ability to join a union regardless of where they work, and create new ways for workers to have power in the economy

Unions:
Fascism: Federalized, mandatory labor unions
Socailsim: Socialists advocate for a system in which the workers control the means of production and enjoy the fruits of their labor
Communism: The Communists argued that workers must rely on militant picket lines to win strikes; waiting for New Deal legislation to bring union recognition was hopeless.
Democrat platform: give all Americans the ability to join a union regardless of where they work

Taxation:
Fascism: A strong progressive tax on capital (envisaging a “partial expropriation” of concentrated wealth);
Socialism: Progressive taxation.
Communism: a “heavy graduated income tax” is a salient feature of the Communist Manifesto
Democrat platform: Democrats will reform the tax code to be more progressive and equitable

It’s truly shocking to see that many Democrat voters in the US have taken a genocidal stance against Jewish people, supporting actual terrorist murderers over a sane normal and peaceful democracy. Israel has not started this recent war, the October 7 attack by Hamas murderers did. Israel is good at finishing them however.

So Gaza is full of people who claim to want to murder anyone not Islamic. They are trained from birth to hate America and Israel and that these two nations must be eliminated for their own best interests. The brainwashing to hate that Palestinian citizens experience is itself immoral, and should be rejected internationally. The propaganda includes false repression, fake genocide claims and a religion which demands the murder or at best complete subjugation of non-believers. In the meantime, Hamas, an organization dedicated to wiping out Israel and America is in charge of the whole population. On October 7, this terrorist designated group started a war with a completely unprovoked attack on civilians.

This is not some case of equivocation where both sides are bad guys some times. This is flat out one side is evil, the other side is good. On the evil side, the only good thing you can say about them is that not every single citizen has fallen for the brainwashing they have received. Hamas has taught a poisonous and sick culture to its members and there is no place for their form of thought on this planet. This is an accepted norm in middle eastern countries as it is part of extremist Islamic religion, and it is not something we can live with or should even consider living with. These evil teachings are not harmless and must be rejected by any healthy minded human.

Socially, a healthy society should reject the Hamas organization and any Islamic extremism on an international level and that is the point of this post. What does it say about our culture, when it cannot universally recognize and condemn obvious evil? It actually disgusts me personally that the entire international community hasn’t rallied against this evil but instead splits into factions of supporters which include those who support the mind-wiped murderers over those defending their right to exist.

Not wanting yourself or your family attacked is common sense, and is becoming one of the most rare of the types of understanding we can find. Long term civility of society requires direct and terminal consequence for those who would commit acts of mass murder. There is no middle option or society is effectively encouraging the next murderous act by those who seek personal power that is only weakly justified through Islamic religion.

Here’s One for the Coincidence Theorists

One quote not highlighted in this video of corruption is the guy saying:
“He’s not going to get elected again, I’ve done the math. It’s impossible.”

So I wonder what math the guy has access to that is entirely different from the polling math? I do believe him by the way.

The video is an absolute news bombshell, except that we already guessed all of this.

  • Constant illegal spying by all agencies on Trump and his family
  • Withholding of key information from the president by the highest levels of his staff
  • Insane narcissism from leftist doing the talking believing he is the smartest in the room by far
  • Flat statement that the re-election of Trump will fail

Another Obvious Reason EV’s Suck

Gasoline has 130,000,000 Joules of energy content per gallon.

Gas pumps are limited by law to 10 gallons per minute. Most operate less than this. Say 5 gallons per minute.

5gal/Min x 130,000,000 Joules/gal = 650,000,000 Joules per Minute x 1min/60sec = 10,800,000 Watts.

So we recharge our cars at the rate of 10.8 Megawatts. BAM!

An electric vehicle recharges at a “quick charge” station at a rate of 150,000Watts with some reaching 350,000 watts.

How much faster can you put energy in a standard car?

10,800,000/150,000 = 72 times faster than fast charge electric

10,800,000/350,000 = 31 times faster than hyper-fast charging electric

Approximately 8 windmills at full output power just to fill my Jeep.

Approximately 1 percent of the output of an average nuclear fission plant.

Georgia Election Fraud. Ballot Images from 2020

Reader Matthew W left a link to this site where a researcher has gotten access to ballot images and other data. As expected, the items he has discovered show multiple scans of the same ballots favoring Biden. Also, he has initiated lawsuits and multiple interrogatories with the state. Very interesting link.

Jeff Fulgam

An egregiously duplicated Georgia ballot made by a voter too dumb to color the oval. Instead they wrote the name in. These images were scanned in different batches. You can see in the faded areas of the line that different pixels are black and white in the two images – this is evidence of two separate scans being done of the same paper. Were it a scaled version of the same scan, the faded areas would have exactly the same missing pixels. (See the vertical line directly to the left of the the Shane Hazel oval in the two different images. The right image is solid while the left image shows a faded gap. These images represent slightly different scanner angles during the vote counting process and are absolutely two different counts of the same ballot.)

A video he made of one hundred duplicated ballots.

According to the vote data, from 2012 to 2020 a block of 125,790 typical non-voters in Fulton showed up and voted. For size reference, this is more than 1/4 of Atlanta’s entire population.

Despite Fulton’s long standing 40 percent conservative history, only 116 of these additional voters voted for Trump. This is a 49% increase in Democrat voters over Obama’s best.

Told Ya

I, and many other engineers, have repeatedly explained that EV’s are non-functional forms of transportation. Yes the cars do move, just not very much. They don’t contain enough energy in their batteries to be useful, and the charge times are ridiculous, and then you have the fact that they aren’t actually environmentally friendly. I like that they can be fast, but that is just the kid in me. No way I’m buying one of these POS’s until one of you invents a great battery and charging system.

DON’T KID YOURSELF, WE HUMANS ARE NOT EVEN CLOSE TO ACHIEVING A GOOD BATTERY.

Electric Cars
Electric Vehicles are Not About Efficiency
The Extremists Are Moving Forward With Dictating Ineffective Electric Transportation — You won’t believe how bad this will be.

Now we find that most of us non-extremist types can figure out the electric car scam. When it comes to spending real serious money (like buying a car or truck) we DON’T WANT YOUR STUPID GAIAN LEFTISM. LOL!! We want something that moves down the road when we want it to – every single damned time.

Unfortunately, when you put morons through leftist indoctrination in school and media and subsequently in charge of large companies — this is the mess you get.

Ford Lost $130,000 on Every EV It Sold in the First Quarter

Lots full of unsold cars.

Ridiculous development costs.

Poor vehicle performance ======== poor sales.

Dumfux

Of course we are only at the beginning because when faced with facts and things physics, leftists almost uniformly resort to TRUTH™ and double down. I’m getting the popcorn out while shareholders figure out that the CEO’s of these groups are unqualified mind-melded brain-scraped morons.

By Any Means Necessary

Today we learn that the Biden administration colluded with NARA to create a false crime against Trump. One that he is still being prosecuted for by Jack Smith. Here is the proof that the white house is fully involved in the weaponization of the DOJ against a political opponent. Watergate has nothing on these idiots.

You have to wonder why the Democrats are supporting this corruption, then you realize that it happens in every socialist country across the planet. Humans, especially gullible ones, should really try to learn this lesson…

Government exists to empower government

And

nobody else

‘All about me’ by Stable Diffusion

Democrats Ought To Be Shamed Into Silence, but They Can’t (Won’t) Even Figure This Out

American Thinker on Conspiracies

Things changed in 2016 when the conspiracies stopped being secret. Government operatives decided they could work with a political party to stop an outsider from playing in their sandbox — by any means necessary. The FBI, CIA, DNC, and MSM created the Russian collusion hoax to undermine Donald Trump’s campaign — but he won anyway.

Four years later, the same conspirators colluded to withhold critical information from the voters which likely would have changed the outcome of the election. Seventeen percent of Biden voters claim they would have voted differently had they known about the Hunter Biden laptop. This time the plan worked, and Trump was removed from the Oval Office. But he was still a threat.

When Trump announced his intent to run for office again, the DoJ in collusion with Democrat state and local prosecutors commenced a campaign of lawfare to scuttle Trump’s campaign. They twisted the law, and corrupted any notion of justice to indict Trump using legal theories which had never been tried before. They have identified their target, and are trashing our criminal justice system to get him — and only him. Lavrentiy Beria would be proud.

Of course, the trials are being held in deep Blue Democrat party strongholds. Partisans in robes — laughably calling themselves “judges” — are ensuring that trials by Trump’s “peers” are actually trials by the Trump Derangement Syndrome-afflicted. Conviction seems inevitable.