Posted by Jeff Id on April 22, 2010
Yes, I’m putting the ‘k’ back in skeptic.
Popular Technology has been adding links to a resource they have created for papers which have non-consensus views. In my experience, the devil is often in the details so when reading, don’t go by the titles and abstracts but get the papers and check them out. Still they have successfully listed 700 papers which they claim have non-consensus views on climatology.
At least a couple of them have storied pasts due to the gauntlet they were forced to run to reach published status. There is one in particular by McIntyre McKitrick again which is a valid criticism of Santers work validating models. The paper hasn’t been allowed by the powers that be to take its rightful place on the list as of yet.
It’s an interesting resource, check it out.