Donna Brazile’s Lies Continue… Clinton Corruption Also Continues
Posted by Jeff Id on October 31, 2016
It seems obvious that the data the FBI has from Weiner and Huma is absolutely damning. Comey had to come out with it now or he would be culpable. Otherwise he could just duck the issue until later. It was already obvious and were WikiLeaks not releasing details behind the scenes, we wouldn’t have enough data to know how corrupt Hillary is and how corrupt the Democrat party is.
On that issue, I fully beleived that in the first debate Hillary was passed the question about cybersecurity. She was too quick on the answer and her answer fit the question too perfectly considering the major criminal issues she faces already. I literally cringed that the moderator asked something so biased in Hillary’s favor but it was the tailoring of the response that made me duck.
Then we had Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile’s name come out in the Wiki releases stating that she shared the questions. She denied it 100%, then we learned that the checksum for the email was perfect so we know Donna is a liar!! She made no comment but today, we find out that she did it another time and actually offered additional questions in the future. Her email is here where she replies that she will send more along with the death penalty question already discussed.
Hillary’s group could have denied the questions being offered. They could have responded that it wasn’t fair to the other candidates. Hill is in on this one too, not just crazy Donna. CNN is also guilty because they were intentionally sharing questions with what we know was their favorite candidate. I for one am certain that this behavior continued throughout the debate cycle — at least until Fox.
The renewed FBI investigation couldn’t happen to a nicer person. If she gets elected, we could go right into an actual constitutional crisis but that doesn’t stop the nut-jobs I heard on the radio claiming that climate change was so dangerous we HAVE to vote for a crook. They literally claimed that climate change was more important than criminality of the candidate.