The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The president of the United States does not need authority to handle classified information. That is why those laws don’t exist. There is no chief librarian that the President answers to, despite the current claims of NARA. The Secretary of State, however, does require permission and did not get it. The SOS also cannot destroy emails under subpoena, but did anyway. She’s a Dem so no harm no foul.
Donald Trump’s house was raided and the FIB followed no procedures to do so. In fact, they have blatantly flaunted the fourth amendment and the actual freaking president can’t get a copy of the affidavit for the search warrant. Odd that some of you consider this ok. It is not. If we don’t stop the lawlessness of the government, you and your family could end up like the January 6 hostages and the rest of society will provide the same effort to help your personal injustice. Nothing.
On August 22, 2022, a magistrate judge ordered the unsealing of a heavily redacted search warrant affidavit. Id., ECF 80, ECF 94. In the public version, released on August 25, 2022, 50 of the affidavit’s 84 total paragraphs are blacked out; of the 55 paragraphs following the header “Probable Cause,” only four are fully unredacted. Id., ECF 102-1 at 7–29. The redactions even extend to section headers. Id. at 9, 18, 23. There is no legitimate basis to withhold the redacted information from Plaintiff.
On August 30, 2022, the Government filed with the Court what purported to be a “detailed” property inventory. (ECF 39-1). However, the supposedly “detailed” inventory provided little in the way of actual information or detail. Instead, the “detailed” inventory incorrectly labeled nearly every document seized as a “US Government Document.” On September 26, 2022, the Government provided a certification of inventory accuracy to the Special Master. (ECF 116-1). It also provided the Special Master and Plaintiff with its third version of the inventory in this matter, which had substantial changes from the previous inventory.
Imagine your frustration at watching this government run over every right you have and paying millions to attorneys to affirm the basic human rights pre-Democrat America used to represent.
In August 22, 2022, a magistrate judge ordered the unsealing of a heavily redacted search warrant affidavit. Id., ECF 80, ECF 94. In the public version, released on August 25, 2022, 50 of the affidavit’s 84 total paragraphs are blacked out; of the 55 paragraphs following the header “Probable Cause,” only four are fully unredacted. Id., ECF 102-1 at 7–29. The redactions even extend to section headers. Id. at 9, 18, 23. There is no legitimate basis to withhold the redacted information from Plaintiff.
The January 6 hostages are experiencing even worse treatment but similar:
The affidavit is a judicial record, and as such there are several grounds for its disclosure. “The common law, the First Amendment, and, as recognized by some courts, the Fourth Amendment may all afford the public a right of access to court proceedings and judicial records.”
Seriously folks, these are public judicial records being held back from the President of the United States. Unprecedented doesn’t even begin to capture the scope of this blatant corruption. It’s all to trick the chicken heads that something nefarious was done. Check out what they took:
Government agents acted with abandon in seizing Plaintiff’s property.2 They seized attorney-client privileged documents, passports, items of clothing, personal photographs, books, and private correspondence between Plaintiff and his friends and family.
There is no potentially legitimate reason to be taking personal photos, books, clothing and ESPECIALLY attorney client documents. You need to talk openly to your attorney in order to understand what is even legal. These sorts of communications are very easily manipulated in the press. For instance, is it legal to fire a person in x situation. “Trump intended to fire a black female-ish transgender furry”
The government agencies have gone nuts with power and people still support it. The EPA is assessing carbon tax again, in case you aren’t paying attention, they are not elected representatives. At this point, I assume that no degree of authoritarian fascism will ever check the bulk of the deep thinkers on the left.
I told you so. Many times. Pay attention to the next 10 years, these are going to be spectacular.