Vigilante Justice

You cannot have a wildly flexible justice system. When a crime is only a crime based on factors not related to the crime, you get only injustice. e.g. Skin color does not change the brutality of a murder. Only the murder itself is murder. Not punishing someone due to their skin color or political beliefs, is approval for the next person to commit whatever crime has ignored.

In this case a pro-life mom was apparently shot in the back by an old Democrat who had fired a warning shot first. The bad Democrat claimed it was an accident but I’ve never seen a gun go off once by accident, let alone twice. Apparently despite not helping the woman he ‘accidentally’ shot. The Democrat got no jail time. Were this my relative and these facts true, which we don’t actually know, I would be forced to punish the bad man myself, because the justice system let me down. Whether this example is well known or not, there are many such examples on record now and it is obvious that skin color and politics are VERY significant considerations in criminal punishment. Two-tiered justice is now a real and significant problem and it needs to end immediately. As is universally the case, the leftists are the ones causing it.

Look no further than January 6 defendants with all rights abused in comparison to murdering cops and fascist blm activists. Yes I’m angry, mostly because people are so dimwitted that they think these facts are things which can be equivocated. Violence is irreversible damage to another person. People who did no violence, don’t deserve their lives destroyed, and people who did do violence do deserve their lives destroyed. I don’t care what imagined outcome you assign to the protest, no lives were destroyed by protesters, only by government. Cops on Jan 6, deserve to be prosecuted when they used excessive violence, the protestors who did no violence do not. America is in decay, entirely because of these endless forms of fascist leftist stupidity and this is yet another symptom of that mindlessness.

If you think people will wake up when they finally see the insanity for what it is, ask yourself where else in all of human history did such a thing happen.

Breaking Seals and Changing Memory Cards – Maricopa

Just prior to the election, the seals were broken on the voting tabulators and the machines were reprogrammed. These reprogrammed machines failed certification testing approximately 60% of the time and were then used in the heavily republican in-person portion of the election. There has been no reason given to change these memory cards in Maricopa, it is an illegal practice once the machines are certified and it is on video.

Like the hundreds of vote fraud video’s shown, the overwhelming statistical evidence, the statements by observers, this video shows damning evidence of illegal election activities. Anyone who tells you “no evidence” of vote fraud, is a liar.

h/t reader Matthew W and Gateway Pundit


Chemtrails are not a theory, they are a conspiracy fact

This one has always made me giggle. I think the moon landing conspiracies are on more solid ground, and they are crazy too. The energy content of the oceans of earth are very very large. A first order check on the area of the sky that could be influenced by chem trails and what it would do to global temperatures proves beyond any doubt that we aren’t going to change temperatures this way. You could try it, but you are wasting your time.

Now are you causing something else like goldfish cancer? I don’t know but this is effing stupid:

To block out the sun, Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering (“SAG”) and Solar Radiation Management (“SRM”) are solar geoengineering programs designed to saturate the stratosphere with reflective aerosols through the use of modified jet aircraft. These are examples of what are often referred to as chemical trails or “chemtrails.”

Unless you are the one getting paid to do it.


Kari Lake lost her vote fraud suit again. The judge pretended to hear evidence, and then pretended to misunderstand the claims being made. He wrote a decision full of unnecessary conclusions while intentionally missing the point of each argument presented.

Rulings of law must not make sense.

As he testified, the human element of signature review consisted of 153 level one reviewers, 43 level two reviewers, and two ongoing audits. This evidence is, in its own right, clear indicia that the comparative process was undertaken in compliance with the statute, putting us outside the scope of Reyes. 191 Ariz. at 92.

The number of reviewers is in its own right a guarantee of compliance. Essentially, the Judge makes the argument that the simple existence of reviewers means that despite the blatant proof that comparison of signatures was not being done per Arizona statute, that people were involved is sufficient evidence. By the immutable logic of Judge Thompson, you don’t need to actually CHECK id when buying alchohol, you don’t need to even ask for Id when buying alcohol, you just need to have someone present when the alcohol was bought.

She conceded that she was not challenging signature matches for any individual ballots by making a Reyes claim.

This quote is stupid because the Judge intentionally disallowed the use of individual signatures in making the argument — then he blamed Lake for his own limitations. Another nonsensical argument by a court — odd eh?

Next is the big problem however:

But there are several problems with this. First, no such baseline appears in Section 16-550. Not one second, not three seconds, and not six seconds: no standard appears in the plain text of the statute.

Image above is from the video at the bottom of this post at Gateway Pundit. If you have not seen the video, the judge has and the person on the right is looking at the image at the top, then scrolling down to see the comparison images. The one on the left is not making a comparison to the reference images.

That is how these ballots got entered into the election and verified as having good signatures. Current ballot images were not allowed for Kari Lake’s team to review for this trial. Only leftist Runbeck and its employees, voting machine companies and all subcontractors, and the county were allowed this data. Remember, in lakes initial claim, hundreds of thousands of these ballot envelopes did not match their signatures on file.

Nowhere In Here

Fourteenth Amendment

Section 1

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4

The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5

The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

The Constitution of the United States is the founding document on which all laws and governmental powers are based. That Democrats ignore this document is beyond dangerous and prevention of violation of these rules is the basis for the existence of the supreme court. Nowhere in the constitution does the president of the United States have control over spending. This was a piece of the idea behind Trump’s first fake impeachment, the withholding of funding already approved by congress for Ukraine. You know, the thing Trump didn’t do, but Biden did do as Vice President ostensibly to protect his own families corrupt international business interests.

Now Democrats in congress, having intentionally failed to negotiate a deal they want to sign, again want to violate the Constitution by claiming the fourteenth amendment allows the president to spend money without them. This act would ignore the constitutionally allowed debt ceiling laws made by congress.

The history of the United States debt ceiling deals with movements in the United States debt ceiling since it was created in 1917. Management of the United States public debt is an important part of the macroeconomics of the United States economy and finance system, and the debt ceiling is a limitation on the federal government’s ability to manage the economy and finance system. The debt ceiling is also a limitation on the federal government’s ability to finance government operations, and the failure of Congress to authorise an increase in the debt ceiling has resulted in crises, especially in recent years.

Wiki crap

Jonathan Turley has this nice article which explains this latest piece of insane leftist nonsense. Why Democrats think this MIGHT be ok, is way beyond me but both parties have been preemptively blamed for defaulting on the debt for decades, this time the Democrats seem to be blamed more? Who knows what the public actually thinks when nothing in the news makes sense.

Fixing Election Law

The quote is over 274,000 signatures were approved in under 3 seconds and then 11 did most of them. So the only thing Lake has been allowed to argue in court is that Maricopa has not followed it’s own signature verification processes. Further, Lake must show that the failure to follow procedure, produced significant numbers to prove with clear and convincing evidence that the election was changed in Hobbs favor.

Lake has narrowed her claim to that complained of in Reyes, and she must demonstrate at trial pursuant to her concessions that Maricopa County’s higher level signature reviewers conducted no signature verification or curing and in so doing had systematically failed to materially comply with the law. This is, of course, in addition to the requirement that she prove that this alleged complete failure to conduct signature verification resulted in a change in the outcome of the gubernatorial election  proven by “competent mathematical basis.” All of this must be done by clear and convincing evidence.  Lake , 525 P.3d at 668, ¶ 10.

These are the judges pretrial words, not only must Lake prove that signature verification was circumvented sufficiently to question the election but that NO SIGNATURE VERIFICATION OR CURING was done- and systematically they need to show that the county failed to comply with the law. That is entirely different than sufficient circumvention of law to change an election. The judge also held her to arguing only the higher level reviewers created this problem. The high level reviewers only see rejected ballots from the first level. This statement significantly reduces the number of ballots in question statistically limiting Lake’s ability to prove an outcome was changed. The addition of ‘curing’ in the statement, is even worse and is an obfuscation of the understanding that the ballots are secret and ANY curing was completed behind the scenes, away from observers, on unknowable numbers of ballots. How do you prove that NO curing was done on a specific accepted signature? Again, you have no access to the data showing what was done.

Well, the Lake attorney’s are going with the time to review ballots based on the fact that hundreds of thousands of signatures were reviewed so quickly that they were simply accepted. This seems very clearly the case at this point based on the following. One reviewer accepted just under 30,000 signatures without any rejections and others accepted over 274,000 on an under 3 second review. The review screens weren’t even being scrolled down to show the reference signature to the reviewer, meaning they weren’t checked at all.

Is anyone surprised by that?

Of the 170,000 signatures reviewed above, 99.97% were approved meaning there were approximately 51 signatures rejected for a city sized block of people. Observers and counters gave affidavits saying they had seen percentages close to 30% rejection in some areas, meaning that in a sane court the lawyers have proven the first requirement that the county systematically and materially failed to comply with signature verification.

Now, according to Judge Thompson, they must prove that these signatures changed the outcome of the election. Again, Lake can’t see the ballots associated with the signatures and has been given no actual access to the signatures. How would she show that these signatures are actually bad? Perhaps it was a city sized block of really well done signatures. Per the supreme court, Lake may use statistics to show the change in the election result but how can she ‘prove’ such a thing without access to the signatures themselves?

It looks to me like judge has set up a nice vacation for himself after he’s done creating precedent to prevent any legal challenges to future elections, while thrashing about like an angry toddler all over Arizona election law.

Maricopa 8, Lake 0

I have a significantly more negative take on the Kari Lake vote fraud trial than is being presented at Gateway Pundit. The ruling by judge Thompson mirrors his initial rulings throwing everything substantive out, in favor of the things that are easier for him to shoot down later. The appearance of a trial is apparently more important than an actual trial.

The entire ruling is here:

Kari Lake’s team discovered that the machines tested in an extra-legal (outside of mandatory legal requirements) procedure and and that the failures of the machine tabulators were a known and expected event on election day. The county testified first that they didn’t know about this, then that they did know but it was minor and then again that they knew and were hiding it from the public.

Judge Idiot seems appropriately chastised and now pissed off that the supreme court rejected his earlier fabricated law and required him to reconsider the failure of the county to give one shit about signature verification laws and procedures.

rejected any claim along these new facts using this as an excuse:

This Court will grant a motion to dismiss based on a Plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted when, as a matter of law, the Plaintiff is not “entitled to relief under any interpretation of the facts susceptible of proof.”

In determining whether a complaint states a claim, the Court must assume all well- plead allegations are true and “indulge all reasonable inferences from those facts, but mere conclusory statements are insufficient.

I’m quite certain that were judge idiot to read this he would interpret my complaints as sour grapes, however the dismissal of Lake’s new claims without being allowed to present evidence is entirely consistent with this courts attitude about vote fraud from the beginning and the judge has set a new threshold which can NEVER be met by any legally presented claim of vote fraud, by Lake or anyone else in the future.

“Mere conclusory statements” is an insanely inaccurate description of the claims made by Kari Lake’s attorneys. It’s an absolute insult as strongly stated as can be in a legal document. You would think that the “judge”, being presented with “mere conclusory statement”s would be able to end the argument right there, however he required numerous additional paragraphs to rationalize these conclusory statements allowing only a portion of the signature complaint to move forward under the courts newly invented law – a law not addressed by the extreme court and one which tAV took significant exception to. Note the bold at the end of the quote in his ruling below. The signature verification methodology is the sole aspect allowed to proceed to trial. Everything else was eliminated before evidence was allowed.

As was said in this Court’s order of December 19, 2022, whether Maricopa County complied with the EPM and statutes governing elections is a question of fact. Lake has narrowed her claim to that complained of in Reyes , and she must demonstrate at trial pursuant to her concessions that Maricopa County’s higher level signature reviewers conducted no signature verification or curing and in so doing had systematically failed to materially comply with the law. This is, of course, in addition to the requirement that she prove that this alleged complete failure to conduct signature verification resulted in a change in the outcome of the gubernatorial election  proven by “competent mathematical basis.” All of this must be done by clear and convincing evidence.  Lake , 525 P.3d at 668, ¶ 10.

The court additionally pretended that evidence had been presented and adjudicated, this is a false claim by the courts and yet another weapon used by judges to ignore difficult decisions.

The allegation of fraud also leaps over a substantial gap in the evidence presented. The Court notes that counsel’s representation of what the McGregor report would show is 180 degrees from what the report actually says. Rather than demonstrating that Mr. Jarrett lied, it actually supports his contention that the machine error of the tabulators and ballot printers was a mechanical failure not tied to malfeasance or even misfeasance.

So Lake proved that the machines were expected to fail but because the report showed that the failure was mechanical, it was therefore not possible to be intentional.

Basically, you knew the brakes didn’t work and sent your wife to work, the car crashed and you collected insurance money but since the after accident report discovered the failure was mechanical in nature it is not your problem. In this case, the judge isn’t even going to ask you if you knew that the brake lines were filed causing the crash, it’s sufficient for to know that the failure was simply mechanical.

Here is the excuse used by the Judge to justify his ignoring of perjury, malfeasance and fraud:

Mr. Betencourt testified that there were, in fact, multiple technical issues experienced on election day. He testified that these were solved by means such as: 1) taking out toner and/or ink cartridges and shaking them, 2) cleaning the corona wire, 3) letting the printers warm up, 4) cleaning the tabulators, and 5) adjusting settings on the printer. It is of note that, apart from 5), none of these solutions implicates the ballot in a manner suggesting intent. Mr. Betencourt testified that each of these on-site actions were successful to varying degrees, with shaking the toner cartridge being the most effective. It is worth repeating that ballots that could not be read by the tabulator immediately because of printer settings – or anything else – could be deposited in Door 3 of the tabulator and counted later after duplication by a bipartisan adjudication board.

As though shaking the toner cartridge was sufficient to cause a 19 inch ballot to be read on a 20 inch tabulator. It’s intentional obfuscation, nothing more. They know damned well that the lines were so long people left and didn’t vote. They also know fake ballots were inserted into the process. You have to prove all of those things before making a claim in a 30ish day window after a fraudulent election now.

This is a claim which was fully litigated at trial and on appeal over seven months since the  November 8, 2022, election. The evidence presented falls far below what is needed to establish a  basis for fraud.

So all that is being allowed to proceed to trial is the ability to prove that signatures were not verified in sufficient quantities such that the outcome of the election was changed. Lake has thus far not been allowed access to those signatures as they are being held by left-wing Runbeck corporation on the Democrat controlled servers. One wonders just how you are going to prove signature verification was not followed when you cannot even see the signatures. Just witnesses I suppose.

It’s still not all dead but it is clear to me that this judge has made his decisions already. He will not be hearing significant evidence of fraud and no matter what evidence is shown, including direct admission of guilt by the county, he will not be ruling in Lake’s favor. As always, I reserve the right to be wrong.

Maricopa Continues the Charade

We recently learned that Maricopa tested its vote recording and printing equipment and found that it failed at a near 60 percent level both before AND during election day voting. The percentage didn’t change appreciably from testing failures to live usage failures, meaning that the county was fully aware that the tabulators would have massive problems only on the heavily Republican election day vote. The county lied openly about this in court multiple times and has been caught red-handed contradicting its own statements as well as by newly discovered evidence.

From the Arizona Times here.

The judge threw out Lake’s lawsuit in December, but the Arizona Supreme Court ordered him to reconsider the issue of signature verification problems.

Lake’s attorney Kurt Olsen told the court that new evidence produced shows there was “clear misconduct and intent.”

He said, “This evidence supports our allegation that the election was rigged.”

Elections director Scott Jarrett, who is an overly emotional hand-wringing patsy for the whole county, should be charged with perjury in my non-lawyer opinion, but that is not how courts work.

The tabulators failed to recognize many of the ballots on Election Day because they were 19-inch ballots printed on 20-inch paper. Jarrett testified at trial on the first day that this problem did not happen. On the second day of trial, he testified that it had occurred, and said the county was performing a root-cause analysis, which was ongoing. Jarrett claimed that it was determined that some techs not authorized by the county made some changes to the printer configurations on site.

The reality is that Jarett is slowly moving from his reluctant lie toward the truth. The machines had been tested and the county was fully aware that these machines would not work, well prior to the election. This information was discovered on the log files from the machines well after the legal discovery period had ended and the first trial had long passed. In other words, the county hid the information from Kari Lake and only later was her team given enough access to find the problem.

Maricopa’s main argument against this misrepresentation of fact during discovery and trial……wait for it…… He asserted that Lake never brought up objections to the voting equipment in Count 2 of her original complaint, so she cannot address it now. He claimed that Lake is trying to amend her complaint now to add it, which is too late.

Pretty solid argument right? /sarc

What a joke our legal system has become.

All is not lost however, the exact same judge has yet to throw out everything on a legally fabricated whim a second time so there is always hope.

After Action Report on the COVID 19 Scamdemic

This article is an important take on COVID 19, what was done and an implied bit of what it means for the future. I will never forget how Democrats and some Republicans acted but particularly the Democrat fascist crowd. All those who claimed the anti-clotshot and the anti-mask folks were being selfish while simultaneously claiming we should all be locked up simply because WE WERE NOT AS STUPID AS YOU.

We were not the selfish ones.

Look at this chart from Citizen Free Press, and never forget what the fascist class of geniuses did to us.

Half of democrats wanted you locked up for not complying with their false propaganda. Their fake science. Their fear based demands that somehow other people, often very science based people like myself, didn’t fall for the lies and stupidity of the media. WE WERE RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING. I don’t recall hearing any apologies from these morons as yet. Somehow, they want us to forgive and forget that they destroyed our lives, took our jobs, made us into lepers, all due to the fear based claims of their fake science. In the meantime, their hero doctor, FAUCI, should be on trial for crimes against humanity for the intentional creation of the disease, and his subsequent lies in congress about its development and the sensationalization of fake cures while repressing functional treatments. Fauci was wrong about everything he said for the entire time he was allowed to speak (masks, vaccines, lockdowns, distancing, remdisivir, ventillators, what the science showed, etc…) — and he knew it. Everything functional in treating the virus was repressed, HCQ, Ivermectin, Mono-clonal antibodies, and the very temporary vaccine efficacy was promoted ahead of all of it.

Evil beyond words and I won’t be forgetting what you very dumb people did to us anytime soon. You are dumb because you didn’t do your own homework, you were wrong for the same reason, and we all expect that for the rest of your lives you apologize to one of us daily for your idiocy. Those of you who thought this way but vote better, also are in the same camp. No points for you either.

Below is again from Citizen Free Press, a fantastic site for media links. This video is here as a reminder to those who believed in this stupidity, many of whom are still so indoctrinated (like the un-showered and masked lesbian lady in the grocery this weekend) that they will never admit their error simply due to their own well-earned embarrassment.

You behaved badly toward us and we expect a LOT of apologies.

New Filing by Kari Lake

This is a very important development in the Kari Lake stolen election case. The judge is starting to get trapped by his own overly dismissive ruling, not that I have any belief that he will rule better, he will just have to dance harder.


The ballot printing failures were known by the county of Maricopa well prior to election day and the machines were illegally tested and proven to fail well prior to election day.

And the county lied in court about this.

Good article, worth your time.

Mental Shenanigans

I have a lot of difficulty understanding the world. Each week we are hit in the leftist media with another mass casualty firearm event driven by some mentally damaged person who society has given nothing to. The answer is most always the same kind of thing – more regulations or some kind of nonsense. Last I heard, murder was mostly illegal.

The problem, stated correctly, is as usual much simpler than it sounds, and the solution blatantly obvious mostly because we already had this figured out a half century ago. First is the mental derangement that we have not only allowed to fester untreated, but the leftists have gone as far as to encourage it. It is not required to be oppressed and need to strike out, now you just have to feel oppressed and you are oppressed.

For example, the very existence CRT is a perfect example of this defective thought process. CRT is the recognition and acceptance that institutional racism is a permanent reality, and is therefore not something that anyone of any race has the ability to change. You can’t actually achieve non-racist status, you can only acknowledge that everything is racist. And better yet, it is white people who are the problem, which by definition is racist itself. CRT is nothing but an excuse to be racist against white people, and the leftists (the smart folks if you ask them) are literally too rock-stupid to understand this obvious fact.

A second example is the new transgender phenomenon where we not only recognize the psychosis of gender dysphoria, we actively encourage it. Literally denying biological facts to support someone’s stated feeling. People have lost their jobs for not accepting psychoses as reality.

So we coddle.

Thieves are allowed to steal without punishment.

Most murders in Chicago go unsolved.

Guns in Chicago are nearly illegal across the board already.

It’s so disgusting that people are now acting as though they are entitled to such behavior. They literally believe people with white skin should even hand all of their earnings over to those with black skin, for a slight that neither group had any piece of control over in the entirety of their short lives.

The problem isn’t more guns on the streets because we had plenty of guns on the street before. The problem is leftist policy against crime and for mental health treatment. The problem is a lack of responsibility for one’s own actions. When you can murder someone in DC and get 7 years, maybe that’s not a sufficient deterrent. People make career choices based on predicted outcomes. When you can murder in Chicago and you have a 1 in 5 chance of getting caught, maybe that is a problem you can take a risk on. When illegal guns and drugs become nothing but a revolving door punishment, you certainly don’t need to worry about that when making your income generating choices.

When the leftist media demonizes the police based on even justified bad events, ignoring the widespread positive events, this only increases the entitlement of the criminal class.

We need a great reset, not of the economy but one of thinking. This needs to happen on the left side of the aisle which throughout history has failed to recognize the destructive nature of its widespread historical sins against race and class. We can only control how we ourselves treat each other, we cannot control how others act. Punishment for crime not committed is as evil as rewarding the commission of a crime. Today, we are doing both in America.

Coddling mental illness, promoting entitlement against other classes and failing to prosecute per the law are causing massive increases in violence and will lead to vigilantism. Perhaps even a justified vigilantism, after all, if someone hurts your family and you take action, who would blame you – except an entitled leftist.

You can take all the guns, and all the cars, and all the poisons, and all the chemicals and you will still have murders in this sick culture we have created. The problem is one of morality and that is what we are missing. The lessons of the church are not lessons given for no reason. They were created because they are true and just, not because they are foolish like transgender ideology or Gaiain fascism.

Mental illness needs treatment, criminal behavior needs punishment, laws are excessive and need simplification and courts need strong legally-structured oversight to prevent judicial tyranny. All of these ideas are what have worked throughout history. As they are historic in nature, they are also conservative. It is time to do what works and stop the madness.

Machines Failed Testing Just Before Election

I’ve had a bit of a cold or more likely COVID Omicron Doom as I haven’t yet taken my governmentally marketed, idiot-approved vaccination for the now extinct version of COVID. Therefore I wasn’t able to watch the entire status report of Kari Lake’s hearing.

Something interesting and new is being reported at the Gateway on this case:

Olsen: We have had teams of experts reviewing cyber data, which was quite extensive, to prepare this report. In addition, underpinning this report are the findings from the McGregor report, which was issued on April 10 that also required integration and evaluation into the motion for reconsideration on the tabulator claim.

There were extraordinary findings of misconduct that are directly related to the Court’s findings in its December 24, ’22 Order, dismissing that claim. The issues are of such an extensive nature; they show that Maricopa officials conducted secret testing on the tabulators on October 14th, 17th, and 18th. That’s after the logic and accuracy test was certified. 260 of those 446 tabulators failed that secret testing, and those tabulators were then used in the election.

Corruption in the Largest Government Ever Conceived

What would happen if you created a government with infinite power AND infinite funding. One the population cannot vote out, who’s only oversight is from itself and it’s only policy resistance is from the same. One to which the media, military, financial and social aspects of society are completely beholden.

Would such a government have a tendency toward corruption?

Conservative Treehouse per reader Another Ian. Read the whole article.

I do miss a constitutional government.