Reader Matthew W left a link to this site where a researcher has gotten access to ballot images and other data. As expected, the items he has discovered show multiple scans of the same ballots favoring Biden. Also, he has initiated lawsuits and multiple interrogatories with the state. Very interesting link.
An egregiously duplicated Georgia ballot made by a voter too dumb to color the oval. Instead they wrote the name in. These images were scanned in different batches. You can see in the faded areas of the line that different pixels are black and white in the two images – this is evidence of two separate scans being done of the same paper. Were it a scaled version of the same scan, the faded areas would have exactly the same missing pixels. (See the vertical line directly to the left of the the Shane Hazel oval in the two different images. The right image is solid while the left image shows a faded gap. These images represent slightly different scanner angles during the vote counting process and are absolutely two different counts of the same ballot.)
A video he made of one hundred duplicated ballots.
According to the vote data, from 2012 to 2020 a block of 125,790 typical non-voters in Fulton showed up and voted. For size reference, this is more than 1/4 of Atlanta’s entire population.
Despite Fulton’s long standing 40 percent conservative history, only 116 of these additional voters voted for Trump. This is a 49% increase in Democrat voters over Obama’s best.
the Air Vent 
Most secure election EVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FWIW, I served as a volunteer election officer for for this year’s primary elections. Our voting machines scan each ballot as they are submitted and reject those with errors like such as those in your report including undervotes (no candidate picked in a race) and overvotes (too many candidates picked in a race). The voter is given a chance to correct undervotes if he wants and re-submit. That ballot would be rejected a second time by the softwares, but would be accepted as is if immediately resubmitted. Overvotes and other mistakes require handing out a new ballot. In that case, the voter is first asked to fill in all of the bubbles so officials have no idea of who they voted for. Things are vastly more complicated than your pictures show, because there may be one or two dozen races and initiatives on a real general election ballot. On co-worker dealt once dealt with a nervous older voter who needed 10 ballots before she managed to fill out one that was accepted. We also had to deal with absentee ballots dropped off on Election Day, and an older couple who had mailed in absentee ballots so long ago that they had forgotten and tried to vote twice. Every few hours, we accurately accounted for every voter who checked in, every ballot that was handed out, every ballot that was counted by the scanner (which we all witnessed was set to zero first thing in the morning), every ballot that was spoiled and every absentee ballot delivered to us, and same-day voter registrations whose ballots were sealed and kept separate and not counted until their registrations were confirmed by the registrar in the days after the election. Everyone needed an ID with a picture from a list of 70 approved IDs or needed to accurately recite their registration address with a non-picture ID. Voters who showed up at the wrong polling place were sent to the right one if they had time to get there before the polls closed. We were told that some voters were now crumpling their filled out ballots in an attempt to force hand counting. We were instructed to give them a second ballot with a warning and call the police if they crumpled their second ballot. Given that this was a primary, we didn’t need to deal with reporters, observers or supporters hanging out around our precinct.
BTW, We arrived at 4:45 am to be ready when the polls open at 6:00 am. After polls closed at 7:00 pm, it took 2 hours take everything down and seal all of the paperwork in envelopes and boxes with tamper-proof tape signed by everyone.
Those like your friend cited above and the Cyber Ninjas in Arizona are unlikely to understand everything that is happening during an election, what happened to produce ballot images like those shown in your article, and how they were handled. The Cyber Ninjas infamously didn’t understand that a lot of absentee ballots dropped off at precincts by people who waited too long to mail them. And I, of course, don’t know how other cities and counties handle the problems I discussed above with different laws and policies, and different voting equipment, etc. In our area, voters submitted ballots to the scanner and fixed their problems on-site with help. Those who collect ballots and later run them through a scanner need to deal with ballots that won’t scan and start by seeing if a copy of the ballot will scan.
“The Cyber Ninjas infamously didn’t understand that a lot of absentee ballots dropped off at precincts by people who waited too long to mail them.”
You fell for the media spin of the expertise level of the Cyber Ninjas instead of reading their report. They repeatedly explained that there was NO explanation given on numerous items such that they had no way to make a determination as to the provenance of whatever issue.
I did skim the Cyber Ninja’s report. The Republican party insisted on hiring a highly partisan group without significant experience in election auditing intended to cast a cloud of doubt about the 2020 election. Did you really expect the Election Department to hold their hands during this audit and lend credibility to it? There were professional election auditors who could have been hired to do an audit and submit recommendations. The Cyber Ninjas spent six? months on a task that the state was required to complete in about 3 weeks. In the end, the Cyber Ninjas found trivially fewer votes for Trump, but still raised doubts about the state’s procedures – which they didn’t understand. IMO, both the left and especially the right are unnecessarily destroying our faith in critical government institutions. The Cyber Ninjas were part of that effort – even though the state’s count of the ballots was correct.
When people don’t trust their government, they turn to a strongman who can protect them from their government – and we both know who has long been auditioning for that role. You can’t even be a Republican official anymore without endorsing Trump’s claims of a stolen election. Sincerely, Frank
Like a quote from MSNBC. Anything to discount the findings. NOBODY has significant experience in election auditing because the fraud had never been attempted on large scale like this.
I do not agree with you.
The fraud was massive and the county was non-responsive with respect to data. In fact, we still don’t have a complete image list of signatures.
This one just pisses me off. You have read here and commented here long enough to know THE BALLOTS EXIST. I’ve told you that so many many times, I can’t believe you rub my nose in it again. Shown video’s and bad signatures and everything. The point cannot be clearer.
The count of the ballots was NEVER the problem in Arizona.
THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE FUCKING VOTERS DIDN’T EXIST.
Is this why they locked everyone down during COVID and told us that vote tabulation would take longer than usual?
LOL. I love you boyz.