Election Interference in Arizona

Law is a funny sport. Almost continually, we have one political side distorting words and taking things in a context which suits them and another side trying to follow the intent of the law, except when they don’t either. Judges have far too much power in our society and there are zero punishments for their blatant lies. This time, a suit was dismissed against Arizona, by a Janet Napolitano appointed judge, Randall Warner. The suit was initiated by candidate Abe Hamadeh about the ‘smack you in the face’ obvious’ election corruption in Arizona.

The FAKE, LIAR reason is spectacularly similar to all the reasons Trump’s cases were dismissed and the reason my attempted Michigan suit was denied — it is too soon and Results Must Be Certified First.

Remember in Pennsylvania, they threw out a lawsuit challenging the rule changes which allowed the fraud after the election, which is exactly what I tried to do before the election in Michigan but was told I had no standing as no damage had been done.

Justice David Wecht, in a concurring statement, wrote that the plaintiffs didn’t challenge Act 77 before the election — gambling, he said, on the outcome.

Here is how this is similar.

Canvassers on the board of Supervisors in Arizona are being told that they must certify the canvas or the Democrat AG will charge them with a felony. Now I can state with certainty, that the requirement of a ‘vote’, means you can legally decide in at least two ways. I can also give you the definition of Canvass.

to examine in detail

specifically: to examine (votes) officially for authenticity

This is not what these folks are being told, and they are literally being threatened by Democrat prosecutors if they do not comply with the vote.

“I found out today that I have no choice but to vote “Aye” or I will be arrested and charged with a felony.”

Ron Gould of the Mohave County Board of Supervisors was told he would be arrested if he did not certify the election.

Mohave was certified under duress. pic.twitter.com/Urt0aWIiyM

— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) November 29, 2022

From here

We’ve been informed the entire Yavapai BOS, with one Democrat exception, expressed a belief the election had serious errors, but were told by the County Attorney, Deputy Attorney, & County Administrator they MUST certify today or face Class 6 felony charges.

— Kari Lake War Room (@KariLakeWarRoom) November 29, 2022

And here is what the Democrat attorney’s are claiming against Cochise county in their lawsuit.

Another organization issued a letter of warning which mirrors the lawsuit now filed by the cheating Democrat SOS candidate.

Now, the Board has voted to delay its canvass and condition it upon irrelevant evidence from unknown “experts.” But as you and the Board are no doubt aware—and as State Elections Director Kori Lorick explained to you in her November 21, 2022, letter—Arizona law requires the Board to “meet and canvass the election” no later than “twenty days following the election,” or November 28. A.R.S. § 16-642(A). This ministerial duty is mandatory, not discretionary: the Board “must canvass” the election results and, as stated in the 2019 Elections Procedures Manual (“EPM”), “[t]he Board of Supervisors has a non-discretionary duty to canvass the returns as provided by the County Recorder or other of the laboratories that tested and certified the voting equipment used in Cochise County.

Note the ridiculous language about irrelevant evidence from experts we are not allowed to discuss. They who must not be named!!!

Everything based on Arizona law 16-642(A)

A. The governing body holding an election shall meet and canvass the election not less than six days nor more than twenty days following the election.

Now keeping in mind what the definition of VOTE means and the definition of CANVASS means, we can easily determine that you are NOT REQUIRED TO VOTE YES TOO ANYTHING. The Democrats are using case history, from other Democrat judges, to force this issue.

The election was illegal, I personally can guarantee that I would take their fake asshole felony charge rather than agree that our vote should be lost. Sounds like a nice relaxed vacation of physical and emotional abuse perhaps in a luxurious moldy DC gulag, maybe some broken bones, lack of medical treatment or communication and solitary confinement.

In the meantime, it is not possible that we have to canvass for authenticity, have to cast a aye/nay vote and can’t ever cast a nay. That is a flat lie and nothing but election interference on the part of Arizona Democrats.

6 thoughts on “Election Interference in Arizona

  1. When were the final ballots counted? Unless the Certification Board is a “rubber stamp” body, one would assume that an extension of time to evaluate the process would be in order to properly “canvass” the results. At the least, the possibly willful ineptitude of those involved in carrying out the electoral process warrants an examination by a suitably formed legislative commission.

    1. Hey Roman,

      Was just thinking about you. I hope things are going well.

      I want to use your least squares algorithm to link tide gauge data soon and have been gradually learning the dataset. No idea what I will find.

    1. It is how some of the ballots were collected. I’m planning to make a post on that tomorrow.

      Lady collected envelopes yesterday. Any way you can get the data, you can create votes. If you overprint ballots, you can collect them more easily.

      It is much much worse than people realize. I estimate 20 million in 2020. Sounds crazy, but I still have the same number.

    2. I like the not-so-subtle call for violence against politicians at the end of your last article. That attitude definitely can’t lead to problems in today’s America, like trying to kidnap a governor or kill the speaker of the house based on a conspiracy theory or something.

      You’re an irresponsible asshole for sharing that garbage.

      1. Nepal, you fell for the governor kidnapping FIB lies? That’s hilarious.

        Nobody believes that, despite the fake verdict. The FIB completely set up chumps to influence an election.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s