This is not about drunk driving, it is about limitation of movement. I’ve written it so many times now, folks need to understand that the totalitarian fascism of historic Europe will be nothing compared to this unconstitutional US government.
Id’s first rule of government.
When the government can make any rule it wants, no matter what moniker it holds true, it will.
Section 24220 in the link above.
Soon they will shut your car off for climate change, and limit your travel for the same. Control is the goal, nothing more and the fascists are winning.
the Air Vent 
> Control is the goal, nothing more…
Good point. This has NOTHING to do with reducing traffic fatalities. Just consider how impoverished we’ve been already from the existing drunk driving laws.
FIRST THEY COME FOR THE DRUNK DRIVERS, NEXT THEY COME FOR THE BAZOOKAS.
FREE THE DRUNK DRIVERS!
Future air vent post — told you so again, again, again, again.
Imagine that. Building infrastructure and creating jobs. What we need are more collapsing bridges and crumbling highways. Why not just let China build ALL the chips – it’s worked out great so far!
Shutting your car off because of collapsing bridges? How the hell are you tying that together?
YOU linked to the legislation. But I guess that was as random as most of your posts and so it’s hard for you to remember back that far.
So because I critique the government’s unconstitutional actions to shut off YOUR transportation, all of it is bad??
Chicken brain.
Jeff –
>… to shut off YOUR transportation,
I don’t drive drunk.
Yes you do.
And you don’t listen either.
Nothing to do with drunk driving.
Jeff –
> Nothing to do with drunk driving.
Interesting.
Consider that just because you think something is true, that doesn’t mean it’s true.
This reflects so many of your posts.
VOTER FRAUD PROVEN!
ALL STUDIES PROVE MASKS DON’T WORK!
DRUNK DRIVING LAWS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH REDUCING TRAFFIC FATALITIES!
Bok bok bok
Yeah, It’s got nothing to do with any type of freedom convoy that goes against the official narrative……
Democrats will always abuse power.
They have zero authority for this law. Not that it matters.
Makes me think Joshua is in the lowest level of the FIB.
Jeff –
I think you can relax. The Republicans control the House and the House in these Republicans hands may not be able to get anything done. Your ideological brethren have enough power to derail anything that the (relatively) moderate sector might want to accomplish. All you need to do is sit back and await the presidency in control in 2024.
Oh. Wait. I forgot massive voter fraud.
Well, at least you’ll have two years of the moms of government you want – one that won’t accomplish anything.
You are no moderate.
Look – you can relax. Folk like Marge are gonna be thereto make sure nothing bad happens.
> You are no moderate.
Lol. I never said I was, dufus. I was referring to the (relatively) moderate Republicans in the house like Kevin Mccarthy
Bok bok bok
Same old stuff
Is dry land subject to flooding once in about a century a part of the “Navigable Waters of the United States”?
Although SCOTUS said “no” in 2015, another case has come before it in 2022, because the EPA just WON’T QUIT!
Now, arguably, when the EPA was entrusted, by legislation with the authority to keep pollution out of the “waters” defined by prior legislation (relating to the Army Corps of Engineers keeping rivers and canals open to barge traffic) — nobody would have believed the legislature intended DRY LAND to be included, or that the new agency would so abuse the defined limits of its new authority to harass citizens in the way that it now does. But, here we are.
And so one who studies the current news (let alone, a mere half century of recent history) can’t help but wonder if giving a federal agency authority to regulate the normal operation of personal automobiles can somehow, miraculously, can be restricted to the bounds originally intended by Congress.
Joshua, you keep up with such news and recent history, do you not?
When building our building, we ended up with a low area about 30 ft in diameter were dirt was removed that grew cattails within a few years. I had a DOT guy working on the road for us out front, tell me that it was a wetland now.
We had it filled in. Now it is a field again.
They were talking permits and all kinds of regulatory crap which we simply bypassed before it became paperwork. I have so many stories of over-regulation created by local bureaucracy they could go for an entire month here.