Gateway Pundit Exposes Edited Evidence From Jan 6 Video

I haven’t written on the 1/6 events much. It’s not because I’m not paying attention but this actually used to be a climate blog. The problem with global warming, is that the corruption of our government has become more important than climate. Several people died on 1/6 and none of them were police – despite what we were told.

Gateway did an excellent write up to which I can only add a bit of technical review and summary, in case you live under a rock or get your news from MSNBC. In a nutshell, on Jan 6, the FIB, a branch of the DOJ and leftist DC Swamp rats used implanted agents to coerce patriots into the capitol and then destroy their lives and organizations. Nancy held back the police presence requested by Trump, the FIB sent agents into the crowd in Trump gear who continually encouraged the young in the crowd to break down police walls walk past bike racks. It has been gradually exposed that the whole thing was planned by the swamp, including the low security levels AND embedded fake news reporters who pretended that Nancy was doing her job during the fake “insurrection”.

When it wasn’t working and people would not properly riot, the FIB did it themselves. They even posed as security to open the magnetic locks on the capitol building. Why would they open the magnetic locks on the building? That is also on camera. The real insurrection was the government sanctioned vote fraud in our cities where Bill Barr didn’t even find it useful to investigate actively blocked investigation of a FULL truck of hundreds of thousands of unexplained, filled-out Pennsylvania ballots coming from ….. New York??

The actual citizens entrapped by the Department Of Justice have been repeatedly abused, have been denied proper defense and are being convicted in fake courts that would make Kim Jung Un blush. Of note, the man in the link above lost his eyesight at the hands of the abusive gulag style prison in AMERICA. That does not happen in normal American prisons kids!! Gosh, it’s odd that you leftist cooks are wrong again, so unusual.

This is an image of the video the ‘prosecution’ allowed the defendants to have for defense, at the moment the second barrier was broken. The actual video now-leaked below that, is what the constitution REQUIRES be disclosed.

Below is an unmodified video of about the same moment. Ray Epps is leading the group through the barrier that Ray Epps was hollering for others to rip down.

Altering video to hide events as though it were just bad data would be evidence tampering and an actual criminal act. This particular moment is supposed to be the key crime committed by Ryan Samsel. But now we find the full video exists and the full video shows un-prosecuted Ray Epps inciting and then passing the barrier with nobody in between himself and the police, and a small crowd of actual protestors following behind him.

Samsel pushed the flimsy bike racks and stormed the US Capitol after Ray Epps was filmed whispering in his ear. According to court documents, Samsel allegedly injured a female police officer.

But you can see from the video that Ray Epps was involved in this first breach of bike rack barriers after Ray Epps whispered in his ear. You can also see that Ryan actually helped the female police officer that day.

Gateway Pundit

And maybe the money quote:

So, Ray Epps was involved in BOTH the first and second breaches of barriers outside the US Capitol on January 6, 2021. Why is this man allowed to run free?

I think we all know the answer to that.

Gateway Pundit

I think we do.

---

On the edit of video where an error is introduced. Simple version, sorry non-math guys:

Video compression algorithms are often Fourier transforms with key frames that have full information. Pixels in frames are represented as changes from nearby and previous frame pixels and the nature of image consistency (autocorrelation) results in massive compression potential. Each time a key frame is passed as the video plays, the full image is represented at that moment, and after that only changes from the key frame are displayed. This process results in amazing levels of compression. If you damage an ordinary frame of the video, nothing is likely to be visible during play. If you damage a key frame, you cause artifacts that look very much like the damaged video in the first image. Damage of data happens all the time, and the government knows that.

This particular problem, and its perfection of location and timing, very much appears to have exploited that knowledge to convict a man of a crime. If the FIB software crew used proper not-lazy techniques, the intentional damage will have been done throughout the video and the change would not be statistically differentiable from a noisy save. My guess is that the FIB is not good enough to use proper data-damage techniques because they assume nobody can figure this out. Before and after subtraction of two full-resolution copies might just bust them good. The problem the FIB has is that while the noisy save can happen with cheap security cameras (also unlikely that this insane resolution camera is cheap), the noisy copy literally cannot happen after that.

Data errors in video are the result of electrical issues that are ongoing. Poor signal is common in consumer video transmission. Have you ever seen digital satellite during rain? You should know that simple software can create things that look like data damage, we did some of that during the early climate phase of this blog. If someone were to look at the raw original video and find that the bad data started and existed ONLY on the key frame, that would be smoking gun proof of edit. I just need two perfect copies of the original and damaged data and we can subtract them to find out whether the DOJ is 100% guilty of doctoring evidence in order to convict someone of a crime. Good luck getting that information tho.

Also, good luck convincing those same chickens who think a vote that has a p value 1e¹¹⁴ off the bell curve “might be normal”, that it is statistically impossible to only have damage on the key frame. However, those of us with math backgrounds would know just fine.

In my opinion, seeing damage at just the right vertical level of the frame at just the right moment to hide Epps actions from the jury, is statistically very, very, very unlikely. Only three verys so I’m not 100%. That it covers the bottom of the frame is part of the compression technique and an expected result of data loss and plausible. That it covers just the right amount of the frame is very lucky.

There are numerous data validation techniques in computerized stored data transmission. One place this data loss doesn’t happen naturally is between stored images on the hard drive and copy as evidence. Unlike satellite Direct TV, there are two-way transmission protocols in place for copying data from a computer to prevent errors during copy, and that is the BIG problem with this revelation. The copy from the computer to the evidence folder is NOT where damage can occur naturally.

That the video was now found undamaged, is spectacularly unlikely to have occurred naturally.

Verdict — I have to say … busted.