Climategate Investigation Pauses, No Suspects……

It seems appropriate that I put this up here also. Andrew Montford, CA and others have reported that the Norfolk Police have ended their investigation into the hacking of online data from CRU. It turns out that none of us climate bloggers (previously popular or otherwise) have been implicated and they claim that my preferred theory of a student with a key to the room is incorrect.

Norfolk Constabulary has made the decision to formally close its investigation into the hacking of online data from the Climate Research Centre (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich.

The decision follows a comprehensive investigation by the force’s Major Investigation Team, supported by a number of national specialist services, and is informed by a statutory deadline on criminal proceedings.

While no criminal proceedings will be instigated, the investigation has concluded that the data breach was the result of a ‘sophisticated and carefully orchestrated attack on the CRU’s data files, carried out remotely via the internet’.

Senior Investigating Officer, Detective Chief Superintendant Julian Gregory, said: “Despite detailed and comprehensive enquiries, supported by experts in this field, the complex nature of this investigation means that we do not have a realistic prospect of identifying the offender or offenders and launching criminal proceedings within the time constraints imposed by law.

“The international dimension of investigating the World Wide Web especially has proved extremely challenging.

“However, as a result of our enquiries, we can say that the data breach was the result of a sophisticated and carefully orchestrated attack on the CRU’s data files, carried out remotely via the internet. The offenders used methods common in unlawful internet activity to obstruct enquiries.

“There is no evidence to suggest that anyone working at or associated with the University of East Anglia was involved in the crime.”

The security breach was reported to Norfolk Constabulary on 20 November 2009, following publication of CRU data on the internet from 17 November onwards.

An investigation was launched by the joint Norfolk and Suffolk Major Investigation Team, led by Det Chief Supt Gregory, with some support from the The Met’s Counter Terrorism Command, the National Domestic Extremism Team and the Police Central e-crime Unit, along with consultants in online security and investigation.

The investigation, code-named Operation Cabin, focused on unauthorised access to computer material, an offence under the Computer Misuse Act 1990, which has a three year limit on proceedings from the commission of the original offence. It has been concluded by Norfolk Constabulary, in consultation with The Met, that due to outstanding enquiries this is now an unrealistic prospect.

Norfolk Assistant Chief Constable Charlie Hall, Protective Services lead, said: “Online crime is a global issue. While law enforcement agencies continue to develop our response to emerging threats, it falls upon individuals and organisations to be alert to this and and take steps to mitigate risk as far as is practicable.”

4 thoughts on “Climategate Investigation Pauses, No Suspects……

  1. Whoever it was – is very clever. They covered their tracks well.

    I guess I should say “are covering” since they are still releasing emails, with veiled promises of more to come.

  2. Unless they provide a good deal more evidence than they have, I think the “student/key” hypothesis is still very viable, as is the po’d FOI officer. The “outside hacker” sounds better for CRU and at least poses an illusion of solidarity within the crew. But it is pretty clear that Harry at least wasn’t happy, and if one wasn’t probably more than one were at least as discontented. The outsider hypothesis one the face of it appears to be inconsistent with the timing

    1. Re: Duster (Jul 19 17:47), Not to mention the selection of targets, the hiding of email addresses, and more. It reeks of insider motivation, of someone outraged by slop and duplicity and determined to torpedo it.

    2. I agree with Duster and Brian H.

      Climategate is almost certainly an inside job, although perhaps aided by

      a.) Agents of any government that might be damaged by the AGW agenda
      b.) Some patriotic agent of the US or UK who saw the threat to free society

      Regardless who engineered the release of Climategate emails and documents, today society desperately needs to find a way to move beyond Climategate to restore

      c.) Integrity to government science
      d.) Civilian control over government

      See: http://judithcurry.com/2012/07/18/climate-models-at-their-limit/#comment-220609

Leave a comment