Real Conspiracies of Climate Science

There are a lot of people who thing global warming is a hoax and others who think it is a real existential threat to society. Both are completely 100 percent wrong. Like most things, reality lies in the middle.

First, it is well known that there is no threat to existence from anthropogenic global warming. We know this from the body of work called ‘science’.

No trend in hurricanes
No trend in drought
No trend in rain
No the fish are not shrinking
No butterflies are going extinct
Polar bears are doing great
Antarctic ice is not shrinking away
Sea level rise is a dead straight line for 150 years
Penguins are doing great too.

That is all scientifically true. Yet how can some claim different? Well a lot of it is media exaggeration of single science papers which many of us consider outliers from the main body of work. However, there are a group of main-stream climate scientists who have learned to exaggerate and even lie about their work as it brings easy fame and fortune. Yes you communists, government money is fortune too and it corrupts just as well as the non-existent oil money would, were it actually being spent on science.

So what I want to write about are a few TRUE conspiracies to corrupt climate science and exaggerate risk. These are just examples but these are the real problems we should be discussing in the political world. Unfortunately, the indoctrinated cannot hear these words no matter how logical or documented they are.

Sea Level Rise

This is a very critical piece of climate change as the majority of atmospheric energy is held in the oceans. Warming would cause both melting and a physical expansion of the ocean water. Both would lead to sea level rise. Despite the fact that minimal warming has been detected with thousands of ground stations and somewhere around a dozen satellites, the ocean has not responded in any significant manner. It is literally rising at the same rate as it always has since before the invention of the internal combustion engine.

We have had zero measured impact on it – per the NOAA.

You can see on the left panel (tide gauge data for over a century) that there is no curvature to the graph since 1960 where global warming supposedly got serious. The panel on the right also has no visible curvature and it is from satellite data since 1993. So what would a conspiracy to make acceleration of sea level rise a real thing look like?

Well, paste em together and hide the recent dead-straight line of the tide gauge data (duh you dumas):

Instant curvature as provided by FAKE science from Columbia EDU. This is a conspiracy to convince morons that sea level rise is accelerating when clearly in the first graph, anyone can see that IT IS NOT CHANGING. This graph with fake curvature, makes the money. BTW, the little 1930 hitch is likely caused by the introduction of different tide gauge stations but it doesn’t matter to us as global warming didn’t start then.

Climate Models Fail Statistically

Climate models are used to determine the future state of climate. In the case of CO2, they are used to determine future temperatures based on different CO2 scenarios. These are similar to weather models except that they don’t work on micro scales and when the right parameters are given to them, like weather models, they can predict the future climate state based on whatever assumptions are given to them. Also, like weather models, their look-forward abilities are not perfect and they will diverge in time. Fortunately for climate scientists, when climate models are wrong, it takes decades to find out and the scientists can retire before their theories are proven inaccurate. For weather modelers, you know how well you did within days or weeks.

That whole lag in feedback leads to a commitment by climate modelers that they believe they are correct, followed by a feedback from actual weather decades later which unsurprisingly does not match. You can see on the far left side of the graph, NOAA measured temperatures — and on the right — every single climate model of note. DOH!!!

Why is this important, well because these models are expecting much warmer temperatures, even existential threat temperatures in the far future. Yet they over-predicted the observed warming in a much shorter timescale. If they are this wrong already, imagine how wrong they will be in 100 years. In other words, the planet temperature is NOT NEARLY AS SENSITIVE TO CO2 AS THEY CLAIM!!! All those models and not a single one got warming right on even a 30 year timescale. You would expect an unbiased attempt to have equal high and low misses. One hundred percent of the models over-predict warming.

And why is that important, well because by the numbers, this low of a temperature sensitivity to CO2 increases means we literally CANNOT destroy the planet by releasing CO2. The magnitude of the effect is not large enough, and the science is in. Don’t worry climate gaian’s, you cannot kill a multi-hundred billion dollar religion by simple facts. It takes a lot more than facts to shake the truth of the indoctrinated class. That climate science doesn’t address the problem is a conspiracy to hide the truth of the matter. Instead the science has worked hard to find corrections to observation to make them appear even slightly warmer. There even have been alarmist papers trying to obfuscate the problem, and the funny bit is, the papers wouldn’t exist if the problem they don’t want us to know about didn’t exist.

We believe in Truth over Facts

Joseph Biden – Subject words capitalized as that’s how he seems to mean them.

For a more technical discussion of climate sensitivity, Nic Lewis has produced what I believe are the best publications on the matter.

Unprecidented temperatures in all of history

Remember this graph —

You can see temperatures in recent years are higher than any time in human history. Unfortunately for us all, this graph is completely bogus. It is FAKE beyond words. There is actually no data of use in it and no matter what data you feed the mathematical algorithm used to make this graph, you get the result you are looking for and a flat handle everywhere else. I’ve demonstrated the effect dozens of times using numerous methods. The simplest methods are shown here. In that post I use the same math and the same data as Mann08 used to show unprecedented temperatures to demonstrate all kinds of ridiculous results. While Mann appears to believe his own work, the rest of climate science has a serious problem with it. They still accept it though due to it’s unprecedented message. This is a conspiracy to convince you that global warming is serious and unprecedented and that we need to take socialism as the solution.

Some quotes from famous climatologists.

the results of this study will show that we can probably say a fair bit about <100 year extra-tropical NH temperature variability (at least as far as we believe the proxy estimates), but honestly know fuck-all about what the >100 year variability was like with any certainty (i.e. we know with certainty that we know fuck-all).

Ed Cook — Climategate Email Dump. This means that he believes that some of the tiny squiggles might be temperature, but the larger movements that don’t happen in the hockey stick handle are bogus. E.g. we don’t know that temperatures are unprecedented. I personally love this quote but challenge ed to show me why the short term squiggles are somehow temperature correlated — they are also just noise.

And another famous quote, also from climategate. The “scientists” are conspiring to delete data they don’t like and replace it with data they do like while not telling the reviewers. This is a common practice in the FAKE hockey stick world. Michael Mann just won a lawsuit for defamation because someone said he was a fraud. I have never made that claim but now we know with certainty, due to the brilliance of a DC jury, that he is not a fraud.

I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd [sic] from1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

Phil Jones – Climategate Email Dump

Literally deleting data by hand that doesn’t match the narrative, as apparently had been done before in the journal Nature.

Because of the evidence for loss of temperature sensitivity after 1960 (1), MXD data were eliminated for the post-1960 interval.

Mann 08, an actual hockeystick paper

From: Mick Kelly
Subject: RE: Global temperature
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:02:00 +1300

Yeah, it wasn’t so much 1998 and all that that I was concerned about, used
to dealing with that,but the possibility that we might be going through a
longer – 10 year – period of relatively stable temperatures beyond what you
might expect from La Nina etc.
Speculation, but if I see this as a possibility then others might also.
Anyway, I’ll maybe cut the last few points off the filtered curve before I
give the talk again as that’s trending down as a result of the end effects
and the recent cold-ish years.

Enjoy Iceland and pass on my best wishes to Astrid.

Mick

Climategate Email Dump

So there you have it, another exposed climate conspiracy. So this is what climate science boils down to:

CO2 warming is real, it is small and it is not at all dangerous, in fact it seems wildly beneficial in that plant-life (actual planetary greening) is blooming like never before. Global warming insanity however, has reached the level of a religion that cannot be opposed. It is funded by hundreds of billions of dollars per year through layers and layers of hidden networks. I’ve spent many hours trying to figure out which money went where. Good luck with that job friends.

Anyway, there are numerous other aspects of this science that are exaggerated and even totally fake. For instance, the Antarctic will not be melting any time in the next 5 millennia – because it is way too cold. Those that tell you otherwise, are simply charlatans.

So the science is sometimes, but not always, exaggerated the UN IPCC exaggerates the conclusions further, and the media takes it to the wall. EXISTENTIAL THREAT!!!! Politicians use the fear to take your freedom and money.

Cars, stoves, refrigerators, air-conditioning, heating, energy generation, foods, land and even fertilizer. There is no end to the limitations they will impose on you, all for an exaggerated science that is full of conspiracy.