the Air Vent

Because the world needs another opinion

Record Income Tax Collection Even After Inflation

Posted by Jeff Id on February 14, 2019

As I reported before, the US collected record income tax revenues after the tax cut.  This is due to higher real wages as well as more people working.  So lower tax = higher receipts for the federal government.  This is a strong indication of what I’ve written here for a decade now, we are on the back side of the Laffer curve and the government was taking so much it was creating a bad economy.  I reported this in my previous post – refuted indirectly by the NYT despite showing no data.  I’ve found several sources since then which agreed with me.

Today I found one that was apparently inflation corrected and still MORE INCOME TAX REVENUE!!

The bad news is that the government spent it all and more!!! — A LOT MORE.

Link to this source is here.

Graph from the article is here:


Posted in Uncategorized | 19 Comments »

YES – Illegal Voting is Rampant and is a Form of Intentional Voter Fraud by Democrats

Posted by Jeff Id on January 27, 2019

Texas has 15.8 million registered voters of which 58,000 had at one point provided identification that showed they were not citizens.    This equates to 0.36% of the voting population which self identified as a non-citizen at some point and still voted.  During the process, they discovered that 95,000 of the same group had actually registered to vote or 0.6% of Texas registered voters are actually self identified as illegal aliens.

Liberal news papers love to make the claim that there is NO evidence of illegal aliens voting in large numbers — these claims are false.







You know when mainstream media speaks on political issues, there is a near certainty that you are being misled.  Of the 15.8 million registered voters in Texas, how many of those weren’t dumb enough to self identify as illegal aliens!!  These are literally the people who admitted to it in a government office!

These fake media outlets loved jumping on Trumps now-disbanded voter fraud commission as one member used the words – lack of evidence. This lack of evidence was stated by Matthew Dunlap secretary of state of Maine in no uncertain terms.  He is of course a Democrat.  His claims were denied by other commission members. In addition, Dunlap decided the voting data for his state was not something he could share even in redacted version.  Some reports indicate that 44 states refused to comply with data requests of the commission so of course if a data analyst can’t access the data it is simple to conclude that there is no evidence of voter fraud.  Of the data the commission collected they did discover 8400 cases of double voting however.  In fact, Dunlap got cut out of some of the communication in the commission as a result of bad blood between himself and the other commissioners and he filed a lawsuit demanding all communications between commission members be given to him as well as any draft reports .  This led in large part to the disbanding of the commission.  None of that deterred Dunlap to proclaim (with no data) that there was no evidence of voter fraud discovered.

What we have in Texas is evidence of MASSIVE fraud.  Even if the number is only double what the idiotic self reporting illegals have listed, we have an enormous voter fraud issue.

Look at this map of voters by county.


Snap 2019-01-27 at 08.27.01.png

Just the spatial correlation with Mexico is enough to see how immigration has effected the democrat vote, now we know that a significant amount of that immigration is illegal and right along the border.

A map of the border wall is fairly interesting as well.   Compare the difference where a wall exists with spaces that don’t have walls.

snap 2019-01-27 at 08.32.55

The tip of Texas is completely unprotected and strongly blue.  Coincidence?  I don’t believe it.

Anyway, legal immigration is perfectly fine and we can discuss all day how much of that we should accept, however I’m tired of my vote being stolen by illegal immigration and blatantly obvious illegal voting.    All claims of no evidence are now flatly false as most people already knew.  Of course if you don’t check citizenship, you won’t know about it and it is high time that Democrats are called out for their obfuscation of this issue.

The theft of my vote is not acceptable.

A lot of good folks died to give me the right to vote I’m told.  The caviler attitude by the left with giving my vote to folks who have no right is beyond disturbing.  It is in fact a line where violence begins to make sense.  70% of these illegal immigrants end up on welfare, stealing my money.  They vote in vast majority for Democrats who promise them free everything – again stolen from those of us who have earned what we have.

Worse, fake activist Democrat judge Judge Jesse M. Furman the Democrats have now blocked the Citizenship question from the 2020 census despite it being regularly included up to the year 2000.   It is insane not to include it but again hiding the problem is another method of DEMOCRAT VOTE FRAUD as it creates representatives for the illegal immigrants in the states they are in – again primarily Democrat states.  Again, this is absolutely illegal activity which results in the direct theft of my legal representation.

So we are allowing masses of poor people to rush across the southern border, receive immediate, long term and free access to government welfare services and those of us who actually contribute and actually understand the constitution of the United States are forced to give our personal belongings and income in exchange for losing our own representation by our own government.

So I’ve heard the argument that more people overstay their visas than cross the southern border.  I will counter that statement with the fact that our government has vetted those people for a history of crime making them much less likely to be in gangs or drugs.  They also are far less likely to be horribly impoverished and they have registered themselves properly making voting for them more difficult.  Most end up leaving in the end anyway but compared to a gang member shipping prostitutes and drugs across our southern border, or economic immigrants looking for free money, they are an entirely different class of people.

It’s quite easy to see why Democrats support such obvious nonsense.  They want the votes.  Without the illegal immigrants, they are much less likely to control the government as a much higher percentage of mainstream Americans have generally figured out what Democrats are doing to destroy our country and constitution.  It doesn’t stop too many of them from supporting illegal voting with a recent poll showing that 31% of US voters think illegals voting is a good idea.   Can you guess which party they come from?  It is a shockingly high number people who should be completely embarrassed of their own stupidity, but there you have it.

I’m truly tired of having my vote stolen by these evil manipulative politicians.  They lie to us almost as much as the Media.  Now that Texas has released its data, we know for sure that illegal voting is absolutely wide spread – not that I’m surprised.

When you don’t check for citizenship, of course you get non-citizen votes.    In California for instance as far back as 1996, Loretta Sanchez won an election due entirely to illegal voting.

1996 Election – California

One of the most extensively documented cases of illegal voting was in California in 1996. Loretta Sanchez, a Democrat, defeated Republican incumbent Robert Dornan by 984 votes. Dornan called for an investigation of alleged illegal voting by noncitizens. According to Congressional Quarterly, a Washington, DC newspaper that focuses on developments in Congress, “Task force Chairman [U.S. Representative] Vernon J. Ehlers, R-Mich., said investigators had found concrete evidence of 748 illegal votes by noncitizens, not enough to throw Sanchez”s victory into doubt.”

I say she won due to it, if you found 784 votes who were certainly illegal, you know damned well there were more.  You also don’t need proof to know which way they primarily voted.  My guess is that when they hit 784, they quit before the election results were changed. Can you guess how many were deported or sent to prison?

Recently 23,000 Californian vote registrations were ‘accidentally’ botched by employees. It was caught by a Canadian who reported the problem on his own license.   If they know of 23,000, there are absolutely more.

In additon, in Cali, not only do you NOT have to provide an ID to vote, you can do it remotely without providing ANY identification whatsoever.  This link is very informative on the matter.

If you don’t check for illegal voting, of course you won’t find it.  If we ever see the actual data from these states, it will be a simple matter to prove it out.




Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments »

Ignorance Gone Wild

Posted by Jeff Id on January 6, 2019

We are told again and again that cutting taxes increases the deficit.  It’s so bad that people have invented stupid programs like the penny plan (which Hannity really promotes) and paygo which used to be Republican and now is being pushed by the Democrats.  I’ve long maintained that these are terrible ideas – because we are on the down slope of the Laffer curve. Taxation is so high, that less taxation results in more economy and more revenue for the government.  Smart liberals know this but they are authoritarians by nature and realize that more tax is inversely proportional to freedom (less freedom) and proportional to dependence on the federal government for services.  So Paygo by its nature completely ignores this situation as do the rules of the ‘non partisan’ CBO.

From Bloomberg.

In total, CBO projects that the cumulative increase in the deficit through 2028 due to the tax cuts will be approximately $1.9 trillion.

Paul Krugman – Literally the fakest economist I’ve read who also happens to be a prime government authoritarian darling wrote this

Later that day the joint committee delivered its predictable verdict: Like all other reasonable studies, its review found that the Senate bill would do little for U.S. economic growth, while directly hurting tens of millions of middle-class Americans, blowing up the deficit, lavishing benefits on the wealthy and opening up new frontiers for tax avoidance

and this:

Just about every G.O.P. member of Congress, including the sainted John McCain, is willing to put partisan loyalty above principle, voting for what they have to know is terrible and irresponsible legislation.

and this:

It was remarkable, for example, to see a group of Republican-leaning economists with serious professional credentials put out an open letter clearly intended to lend aid and comfort to Mnuchinesque promises of miraculous growth.

Pelosi said this:

simply theft—monumental, brazen theft—from the American middle-class and from every person who aspires to reach it.

The genius Schumer said –

cynical one-two gut punch to the middle class—raise their taxes to pay for corporate tax cuts & then decimate their earned benefits as a kicker.

Of course they were just lying like they so often do.  Lying is a word used inaccurately far to often in the political spectrum, when I use it I mean telling a non-truth that is known at the time to be a non-truth.   They knew damned good and well that the tax changes were significant cuts. And even though America figured out that the cuts worked, these central government authoritarians have repeatedly stated that they still want to undo the cuts as soon as they get power.

So we went against Krugmans authoritarian government-knows-best vision and lowered taxes in 2018 – and  the economy boomed and federal government got more revenue including significantly more from income taxes.


Increased revenue from INCOME TAX due to a cut in income tax rate!!

Increased overall revenue

Highest wage growth in years.

Lowest unemployment in numerous categories

Massive economic growth

Huge holiday spending

Big job creation

Manufacturing growth – this is very critical to a successful country!

#1 energy producer in the world

Looks like business owners actually know economics.  Huh…..who would a thunk it.

I’ve generally been forced to move on from blogging.   It is a lot of work running a now-large company and we used the cuts to invest massively in new injection molding equipment right here in the US, which we can now write off and will add numerous highly skilled people for decades to come.  I’ve written before that our effective tax rate was over 80% because nothing is considered an expense.  It isn’t that much better now but it was enough to allow the investment into American business and treat a massive expense as an actual expense – which it is!  State taxes and inventory are still not considered expenses despite the massive check writing but equipment at least is.   In addition to the advantages from tax cuts, we are forced into paying people more and having to compete harder to keep good workers.  The effect is non-trivial and has showed up in jobs growth numbers, wage numbers and even spending numbers. Investment is high, growth is high, imagine where we will be if this were to continue on Trump’s very positive path for another 6 years.  He gets 100% of the credit for this at this point. So much resistance from the authoritarian swamp including his own party.   It’s huge folks, it’s real, and if you are finding yourself in disagreement, you need to do some serious reading or perhaps not vote, because you are flat effing wrong! 

Like climate change, the evidence is directly in front of you, it is up to you to be smart enough to read it.

Unfortunately, the pro-government authoritarian left has taken over education at all levels and are pushing socialism in its most evil forms.  The federalist papers and the constitution have nothing to do with socialism.  In fact, there is no room in the American constitution for socialism under any interpretation and the judicial branch should strike much of it down as unconstitutional.  The result however, has been extra-constitutional departments and regulations which have no true foundation in law, approved by socialist activist judges who at best are fake and in far too many cases literally operate above the law with no effective method of censure.  In the US,  one of the three branches of government is more equal than others.

I see no end to it though, in recent news, we watch the authoritarian left promote more anti-constitutional socialism at every turn, and it drives a great fear into my heart to see such stupidity taking over the now completely socialist Democrat party.  Democrats used to at least have the appearance of rational thought, or consideration of the constitution, although many of us could see them clearly through the fog of politics just fine. Now the inability of voters to comprehend what will come of their authoritarian government-first policies is absolutely terrifying.  I’m afraid for my regularly indoctrinated children, because this socialist ignorance is preached to them in school as though it is unquestioned knowledge on a daily basis.  My wife and I can probably save their minds, but other parents are helpless in the face of the onslaught. As a contemporary example, 29 year old Cortez literally doesn’t know anything about economics and she supposedly has a degree in it.  Her life experience in economics is limited to keeping her tips off the books and out of her co-workers hands but as an un-spanked millennial, she will not even listen to counter-arguments on the matter.  She already knows all, and that is the big Democrat socialist visionary who is going to lead the country to 70% federal taxation (of business too) and no fossil fuel.  Given the power to enact these plans, she would close us down overnight and some at least equally ignorant voters gave her a lot of power!!

She’s just a truly dumb person and her equally dumb self-confidence in the face of her ignorance cannot be cured.

According to the demonstrably fake socialist economic models, the way for the federal government to pay for something is HIGHER taxes, but we’ve just seen the opposite, lower taxes gave MORE revenue.  So if paygo were in effect, when we enact a new big unconstitutional program like the Department of Education, we must then fund it with increased taxes. So in our current over-regulated and over-taxed situation, when you raise taxes, you have less money in your personal pocket (less freedom), the government has less money in their pocket from you (bigger deficit), and then you will need more money printed by the government to save the people who fall off the bottom end, which will require more taxes to pay for it!!!  Pure genius orchestrated and voted for by an ignorant population and their authoritarian masters who are very happy with the most ignorant and financially needy constituents possible. I’ve heard rumors that the masters will even import the least educated of them en-masse and hand them free money — can’t be true though right?

We need to return to the constitution of this country in order to save America.  I don’t see it happening any time soon, so while my crystal ball doesn’t work any better than Krugman’s, the kids will likely starve in the socialist truly anti-American future.  In the meantime, lets enjoy the success of a tiny bit of sanity introduced by our orange leader Donald Trump who has turned out to be a much better president than I had ever imagined he would. To his so-scientific detractors, we all need to change our ideas in the face of data, and the data shows he was right (and BTW so was I so many times on this exact blog), tax cuts and regulation reduction did lead to success at every level, and the Krugman ilk’s twisted-socialist and completely fake economic models were wrong.









Posted in Uncategorized | 19 Comments »

Muppets Like Me

Posted by Jeff Id on February 18, 2018

So lets have more fun than that.

I’m done with the authoritarians FAKE game of skin color.

never cared who’s skin was what color

never will.

BUT Neither did you…..

BUT that is what the authoritarians want us to discuss.  It isn’t that mexicans have invaded our country en masse, it is that we are racist for noticing that they are fucking Mexicans.

Not my fault.

I love Mexicans by the way.

Unlike our millennials, they are future voters of common sense who know that governments can actually screw you in a manner that you cannot recover from.  BUT on the average, they are blatantly uneducated, ignorant, and unmitigatedly hard working people who are running away from the disaster of a government they actually voted for.

Someday, when they can actually read English, those same Mexicans will vote conservative.   In the meantime there are many millions voting for leftist authoritarians, because our politician leftists sound like the same leftists who ruined their country AND Venezuela.

We don’t have any need to accept them as voters today.  No immediate need. No requirement for cheap labor, no requirement for expensive, on the authoritarian dole, voters.

See how that works?But you are supposed to think lack of amnesty is a big deal for you personally.  Amnesty is above actual tax cuts, above actual health insurance deregulation, above food stamp programs, the military, selling our uranium to aggressors, authoritarian politicians ignoring actual written law, on and on.

You are supposed to think you are racist.

You are told to think that illegals need citizenship.

You are told that spending on preferred government items is needed.

You are a muppet!!

Me too, but — I’m changing.

Posted in Uncategorized | 19 Comments »

Easy Call

Posted by Jeff Id on June 17, 2017

America is not allowed to elect a conservative president of any form.  The deep state, fourth branch of government has declared that they now have critical mass to enforce their will upon us independently from our elected officials.  Liberal feeders have infected every branch of government, media and education to the point where even without any evidence, a conservative president will be impeached.  There is zero evidence that Trump has done anything wrong, yet we are surrounded by openly visible liberal crimes that go un-prosecuted.   Comey leaking to get a fake prosecutor, Hillary selling the US for personal gain, Obama fast and furious, Hillary’s dead ambassador to Lybia and the lies to cover it, instead we have fake prosecution recommended by deputy ag Rosenstein for Trump firing Comey, the very act that Rosenstein recommended in a public letter.  Now we have a fake ‘public’ trial by partisan judges where every witness admitted that there is no evidence of wrongdoing.   A trial which hasn’t ended because now the prosecuting liberals have switched from the proven false ‘Russia stole the election’ charges to different FAKE charges of obstruction of justice.  Obstructing the investigation of the proven fake Russia stole the election charge by the way.

How does one obstruct justice regarding the non-investigation of a fake crime?

Only in America methinks.

Trump could order the investigation of something he was guilty of, stopped,  without being guilty of obstruction by the way, because he’s actually the boss.  He’s completely allowed to do that.  Any common sense in America?  No, instead, Muller hired 13 lawyers to prosecute a crime which by definition cannot exist.   Trump is in charge of the FBI.  He can stop any investigation at any time, yet he did NOT.

13 LIBERAL lawyers. Hillary and Democrat donors, Investigating a president without even a potential crime.  YES they will make something up.  We don’t know what but LAWYERS lie for a living.  They twist fact into innuendo as a matter of duty.  They find crime and innocence where none exist, and innuendo is their primary weapon.  Having so many liberals paid to find a problem with the president is a huge issue.

But it got worse today.


“All Americans, regardless of party, agree on the fundamental principle that no one is above the law,” Rep. Ted Lieu (D-CA) told MSNBC Friday. “And if President Trump were to fire Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein, and then [get] special counsel Mueller fired, I believe Congress would begin impeachment proceedings.”

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) echoed Lieu’s sentiments, saying that Congress would come together to make sure they overrule Trump’s authority on the matter.

“Congress will not allow the president to so egregiously overstep his authority,” Schiff said in a statement.

America is in trouble when the left, with no evidence can issue a statement to THREATEN the boss of the FBI with impeachment if he doesn’t allow his own employees to prosecute him for something that DID NOT HAPPEN. Obstruction of false politically motivated liberal attacks is the true crime and that is nothing but a job well done.

It seems Trump has little choice.  In his place, I would fire them all right now with the statement that it is in our country’s best interest that these idiots move on.  Muller, Rosenstein, and about 2500 other Obama swampmongers would leave right at this exact moment if I had the ability.   Trump gets the same result either way, prosecution, innuendo and nonsense.  Chuck them to the curb with extreme prejudice and put in someone who will investigate Comey, Clinton, Muller’s fake investigation and Obama.  Because those folk all actually did obstruct “justice”.

Clinton lied to investigators–obstruction.

Clinton destroyed evidence–obstruction.

Clinton bribed and manipulated office holding investigators — obstruction.

A democrat operative who was apparently leaking to Wikileaks was shot.   obstruction.

NO REAL INVESTIGATIONS of any of these things.





Posted in Uncategorized | 47 Comments »


Posted by Jeff Id on June 6, 2017

[I’m self snipping this post – not because I disagree with it but because I can’t do anything about fake news so I might as well ignore it.]  I will say though, that I’m still pissed about it.



Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments »

Bye Bye Paris

Posted by Jeff Id on June 2, 2017

I am absolutely thrilled to see a tiny bit of sanity in our government.   Every day the left gets loonier with one fake conspiracy after another dying when hit by fact, and every day Trump makes a little more sense from it.  Not sure why pulling out of the Paris agreement was so damned hard a call, like firing the idiot inspector Comey, it was the most obvious decision in the world.  Fake CNN news seems to be the order of the next 4 years, and people can see right through it.

Image result for pink panther

The more time they spend on fake Russia nonsense the better, I just wish real news outlets would ignore it so I wouldn’t hear about it.  When dropping out of a completely bogus climate agreement prompts fake articles about attacks on minorities and children and on and on, it just makes me giggle. People really are idiots.  I wish it would make some difference in the pro-socialist and otherwise fake climate-change industry, but the push to socialism won’t even be slowed down by it.  I wonder what idiots will think in 50 years when we still don’t have a single piece of evidence of any bad effects from man-made climate change.

Some sanity in the midst of the idiot shit-storm only politely referred to as news, was rather nice.

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments »

Changing the Subject

Posted by Jeff Id on March 26, 2017

I’m not sure how to reply to PSI.  They’ve written a post which I don’t seem to be allowed to comment on or there is some technical problem.  Read at your own risk, if you find yourself agreeing with it, I recommend you wash your mind with some kind of acidic cleaner to get the nonsense out but people vote oddly so I don’t have any illusion that some won’t fall for it.  The post claims they have somehow been wronged by my argument, as I brought up the quantum nature of thermodynamics during a ridiculous discussion from literally 4 years ago!!   The discussion in question absolutely required quantum thermodynamics, but PSI is not a group widely cited for their knowledge of thermodynamics.  I will again, yes again, explain below.

They present an equation for radiative transfer of energy between two bodies:

Q ~ σ(Th4 – Tc4)

Us engineers have seen it. Radiative heat = “constant” times the fourth power of the temperature difference between two bodies – hot and cold.  Materials emit radiation at the fourth power of their temperature.  While the PSI group can sound reasonable to an untrained person, this equation tells the story of their own failure of understanding.

Most any high-school student can tell you that heat flows from hot to cold.  In large groups of atoms, such as a microscopic organism or larger pieces of flea dander, Thermodynamics becomes a bulk property science which represents billions of atoms interacting.   Good students can figure out that the heat flow between larger globs of atoms, is two directional between hot and cold, (it goes both ways Cali style) but the flow nets toward the cold in the exact amount predicted by the basic thermodynamic equations as shown in the radiative transfer equation above.  See each atom in the glob has its own unique energy state and physically can exist at a different energy level than its neighbor.  PSI members can’t figure that easy bit out, their members repeatedly claim that somehow energy emitted from a cooler body detects the “net” state of the warmer rather than the local state of the atom actually being affected, and somehow is prevented from transfer.  Completely non-physical nonsense.

Conduction or radiation, the effect is the same.  In any body there are atoms at different vibrational energy levels.  Vibration=heat.

Below is an example of heat movement in the wrong direction:

Imagine a tiny sphere of a billion atoms of pure solid hydrogen at absolute zero temperature, born in a universe where no other radiation was impinging upon it.  No vibration in the atoms whatsoever.   One photon of the correct wavelength strikes the sphere and is absorbed!  Does one photon absorbed into a hydrogen sphere cause all atoms in that sphere to rise in temperature, or just one atom?  The answer quantum mechanics gives is one atom.  That energy will then be transmitted in quantum nature to its neighbors dropping the original atom back to absolute zero and heating its neighbor to 1 arbitrary temp unit.  If the sphere of a billion atoms, and the energy didn’t radiate out to the surrounding universe, that same unit of energy would transfer from atom to atom, all around the sphere, with each different hydrogen atom rising in temperature and falling back to zero as it transfers the energy to the next absolute zero temperature neighbor.   Other unaffected atoms wouldn’t recognize any difference in their own temperatures as they are still at absolute zero energy state.

Now imagine having two of those one billion atom spheres, each one having absorbed two photons.  Two hot atoms inside of two billion atom spheres.  When measured with a properly sensitive instrument, both would have a non-zero temperature because the hot atoms would occasionally affect the amazingly good temperature sensor.  Assume sphere 1 emits a single photon by radiation and it impinges on sphere 2.   Now since these are billion atom spheres and only two of the atoms are energized, I’m going to assume that 999,999,998 in a billion which is really close to 1/1, chance of striking a zero temperature atom on sphere 2 came true, and that the photon struck an absolute zero temp atom on sphere 2 and was therefore absorbed into sphere 2.

Now here is the trick…

Before the photon left sphere 1, the equivalent spheres had 2 photonic units of energy and were equal temperature. The instant the photon left sphere 1, sphere 1 only had a single photon of heat instead of two which sphere two has.  It traveled across the between these spheres at that point going from a colder body to a hotter one, struck the hotter one and was absorbed by an atom at absolute zero temperature.  Heat energy moved from hot to cold.   If you say NO Jeff, it went from equal to equal, that’s fine too because the ENERGY moved from sphere 1 to sphere 2 and created heat.

The story gets worse!!!

Although sphere 1 only has a single photon left, and despite the 3:1 odds, not so amazing if you’ve ever rolled dice, it emits its last photon of heat before sphere two does!!!  Evil thing.

Anyway, that photon travels the short distance between the two spheres and also strikes the surface of sphere 2 which holds the quantum heat of 3 of these same photonic interactions.  3/1,000,000,000 atoms are energized, so again using basic probability, there is basically a 1/1 chance that the photon will strike an absolute zero atom.  In this example, the photon did not win the super-lotto with powerball and did in fact hit the surface of an unenergized atom and was absorbed.  4 to nuthin!! [edited for clarity]

Energy has again transferred from cold to hot [edited].  Jeff Id, god of basic high-school thermodynamics, has done the impossible!!  Who let the cats out!

PSI cannot accept this ridiculously basic thermodynamics, although every member I’ve run across has their own morphed version of thermo, so I won’t be surprised when one of the folk agrees with this and comes up with a different and equally mental argument.

How is a single photon relevant?  PSI can account for all of the photons from the cold source by using traditional physics, and the equations show that the cold source does not heat up a hotter source.

My bold.  My example follows the equation above but contradicts the bold of their own post0.  My example is also standard thermodynamics.  My example is accurate, standard, simple, explains how quantum physics is relevant and completely destroys most of the PSI member arguments, leaving room only for those who are more mentally muddled than others.   But I’m not done yet!

So PSI members of different ilk may be the problem.  We have had more than one of them even claim that somehow the photon knows it came from a colder body and will automatically reflect without absorption from the warmer body.  Truly silly stuff but it’s right there in the equation.

Q = σ(Th4)     — hot body “emission”

Q = σ(Tc4)     — cold body “emission”

Both are emitting photons!!!

Both emitting energy outward..

both receiving energy inward from both hot and cold bodies per the example above.

the difference in emission (assuming all energy strikes the other body) is the amount of heat energy transferred:

Q ~ σ(Th4) – σ(Tc4)

Q ~ σ(Th4 – Tc4)

And the probability lesson shown in the extreme above, is why photons which ARE emitted from cold objects, don’t “bounce off” of hot ones. At Earth temperatures (meaning not plasma hot) nearly 100% of the energy states potentially available for absorption of a photon are actually available at any one time.  Near 100%.  What that means is that cold body emissions, conductions etc… are absorbed into hotter bodies, making them warmer than they otherwise would be.  Cold to hot…

This is not a violation of thermodynamics.

The reality is though that despite nearly 100% of the absorptive sites being available, any non zero percentage of un-energized states in the atoms would allow for absorption from cold to hot bodies, and since the equation above is based on de-energization of an available site, they prove my case for me.

Energy can move from cold to hot!  Just don’t try to do any work with it — that is a different story and rather cute imho.

So in global warming science, the government claims consensus on global warming danger, but the government is lying by omission.  There is no significant controversy on the absorption wavelengths or emission wavelengths of different materials at different temperatures, so there is no real argument in science about the basic CO2 warming effect.   However, there is no consensus (good name for a blog) on dangerous warming, and most “scientific” people believe CO2 warming is NOT imminently dangerous.  Therefore there is absolute consensus with respect to the warming effect of CO2, it is basic optics/thermodynamics –  outside of the flat earth PSI types.

In the real world, there is no consensus that the effect is an actual problem and significant evidence that it is absolutely NOT a problem.




Posted in Uncategorized | 41 Comments »

Concerned Scientist Kenji knows — Unvetted

Posted by Jeff Id on January 30, 2017

So, to the couple hundred readers who still stop by, Anthony Watts has a fun activity going on.  Kenji, the full fledged yet unvetted member of the union of concerned scientists, is going to Washington.  Kenji has been “concerned” for a half a decade at this point — 35ish dog years depending on which linear or nonlinear dog to human conversion you prefer. Heck I don’t know Kenji, but judging by the muzzle, he’s experienced nearly half a tenth of a degree of average global temperature rise, and in California — that’s food-dish spilling “serious crap”.

But let’s not talk methane….  This is about saving the planet’s fuzzy green ass and that is a serious matter.

Help send Kenji to the “Scientists March on Washington” event!

Look at the high forehead and messy hair.  A clear sign of inspired genius.  Long hours of studying nature with little room for grooming.  With his overwhelmingly efficient thermal coating, Kenji is a natural representative for those who recognize CO2 traps heat, yet somehow he can still find his food bowl!   Adaptation folks —it’s the name of the game!

Anyway I chucked in, you should too.  The fuzzy kid might need a kevlar coat to walk today’s Washington DC crowds.  He does have that cute but angry look of a snowflake though so hopefully the rest won’t bother to read Anthony’s sign.


Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments »

Trump Immigration Executive Order “Full Text” — Bigot

Posted by Jeff Id on January 29, 2017

Definition of bigot

  1. :  a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially:  one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

So that is what I was called by the Neuvo-climate bloggers of recent years.   Bigot- for daring to suggest that the idea that immigration be stopped from middle eastern countries until those immigrating could be fairly documented.  Hmm.  Today, the leftist extremists which govern most media are in a tizzy because that is exactly what happened.   Trump and conservatives like myself are being labeled a bigot by any leftist who can.  Frankly I’m sick of being called names by the unlearned, but there are a lot of them.  Any anti-freedom moron with a typewriter is working their exclamation point and cap lock to the maximum level this week, to show that Trump is a bigot, the law has no reason etc…

I’m a logical person so I read arguments against and for.   My favorite argument against is that Trump ignored countries that he had business interest in.  As is almost always the case in left-land this is FALSE.  The countries were chosen by their willingness and ability to provide proper immigration documentation per our federal agencies – PRIOR to Donald Trump taking office.  So for the slow readers — Trump used existing law to select the countries…

I don’t have the personal will to explain everything to people who can’t figure out the realities of this executive order.  This order is well within his constitutional legal authority — for those who make that stupid argument.  It is clean and simple and in my apparently much bigoted opinion, doesn’t go far enough.

Marches for the practice of Socialism, Nazi’s and Sharia rate as high as the KKK in my book.  They are all the same thing in different forms.  Beating women with sticks is standard practice under Sharia law, although they are kind enough to designate the size of the stick.  Driving is no good, voting is not an option, legal testimony is less worthy, on and on.

These countries are infested with illness of thought, as are many in our own left-wing population.  The Muslim countries who made the list contain good people who know right from wrong BUT they are not of sufficient percentages to remove the evils of Sharia from the central power systems of their governments.  In fact, they are not even close to achieving that lofty 17th century goal.  The concentration of support for Sharia is in fact overwhelming, because the population has no free choice in the matter and has been raised since birth to understand that they will not ever have that choice.  We therefore have a high probability of importing very bad people from the Muslim world.  Germany and France have recently proven what happens when you import large numbers of un-vetted Syrian immigrants.  Their dead and raped families are not unworthy of our consideration.

And that is why the law isn’t strong enough.

Most Muslims support blatantly evil Sharia “law”, but Muslims were not banned from the US by Trump, only pre-selected countries who will not provide sufficient documentation for their exported citizens were banned – temporarily.  Plenty of Muslims are still allowed in.  To make my point, if you believe in statistics, MOST people from Muslim countries, by a long shot, will be Sharia law supporters. What do I know though, the snowflake girls who holler about “women’s rights” and “not my president” –that really obviously need folks with brains to keep them straight– think I’m just a Bigot with a keyboard.

It is hard to find the full text of Trumps order so I did and copied it here.

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and to protect the American people from terrorist attacks by foreign nationals admitted to the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Purpose. The visa-issuance process plays a crucial role in detecting individuals with terrorist ties and stopping them from entering the United States. Perhaps in no instance was that more apparent than the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, when State Department policy prevented consular officers from properly scrutinizing the visa applications of several of the 19 foreign nationals who went on to murder nearly 3,000 Americans. And while the visa-issuance process was reviewed and amended after the September 11 attacks to better detect would-be terrorists from receiving visas, these measures did not stop attacks by foreign nationals who were admitted to the United States.

Numerous foreign-born individuals have been convicted or implicated in terrorism-related crimes since September 11, 2001, including foreign nationals who entered the United States after receiving visitor, student, or employment visas, or who entered through the United States refugee resettlement program. Deteriorating conditions in certain countries due to war, strife, disaster, and civil unrest increase the likelihood that terrorists will use any means possible to enter the United States. The United States must be vigilant during the visa-issuance process to ensure that those approved for admission do not intend to harm Americans and that they have no ties to terrorism.

In order to protect Americans, the United States must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes toward it and its founding principles. The United States cannot, and should not, admit those who do not support the Constitution, or those who would place violent ideologies over American law. In addition, the United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry or hatred (including “honor” killings, other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice religions different from their own) or those who would oppress Americans of any race, gender, or sexual orientation.

Sec. 2. Policy. It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from foreign nationals who intend to commit terrorist attacks in the United States; and to prevent the admission of foreign nationals who intend to exploit United States immigration laws for malevolent purposes.

Sec. 3. Suspension of Issuance of Visas and Other Immigration Benefits to Nationals of Countries of Particular Concern. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall immediately conduct a review to determine the information needed from any country to adjudicate any visa, admission, or other benefit under the INA (adjudications) in order to determine that the individual seeking the benefit is who the individual claims to be and is not a security or public-safety threat.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the President a report on the results of the review described in subsection (a) of this section, including the Secretary of Homeland Security’s determination of the information needed for adjudications and a list of countries that do not provide adequate information, within 30 days of the date of this order. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide a copy of the report to the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence.

(c) To temporarily reduce investigative burdens on relevant agencies during the review period described in subsection (a) of this section, to ensure the proper review and maximum utilization of available resources for the screening of foreign nationals, and to ensure that adequate standards are established to prevent infiltration by foreign terrorists or criminals, pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens from countries referred to in section 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12), would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the United States, as immigrants and nonimmigrants, of such persons for 90 days from the date of this order (excluding those foreign nationals traveling on diplomatic visas, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visas, C-2 visas for travel to the United Nations, and G-1, G-2, G-3, and G-4 visas).

(d) Immediately upon receipt of the report described in subsection (b) of this section regarding the information needed for adjudications, the Secretary of State shall request all foreign governments that do not supply such information to start providing such information regarding their nationals within 60 days of notification.

(e) After the 60-day period described in subsection (d) of this section expires, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the President a list of countries recommended for inclusion on a Presidential proclamation that would prohibit the entry of foreign nationals (excluding those foreign nationals traveling on diplomatic visas, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visas, C-2 visas for travel to the United Nations, and G-1, G-2, G-3, and G-4 visas) from countries that do not provide the information requested pursuant to subsection (d) of this section until compliance occurs.

(f) At any point after submitting the list described in subsection (e) of this section, the Secretary of State or the Secretary of Homeland Security may submit to the President the names of any additional countries recommended for similar treatment.

(g) Notwithstanding a suspension pursuant to subsection (c) of this section or pursuant to a Presidential proclamation described in subsection (e) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may, on a case-by-case basis, and when in the national interest, issue visas or other immigration benefits to nationals of countries for which visas and benefits are otherwise blocked.

(h) The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall submit to the President a joint report on the progress in implementing this orderwithin 30 days of the date of this order, a second report within 60 daysof the date of this order, a third report within 90 days of the date of this order, and a fourth report within 120 days of the date of this order.

Sec. 4. Implementing Uniform Screening Standards for All Immigration Programs. (a) The Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall implement a program, as part of the adjudication process for immigration benefits, to identify individuals seeking to enter the United States on a fraudulent basis with the intent to cause harm, or who are at risk of causing harm subsequent to their admission. This program will include the development of a uniform screening standard and procedure, such as in-person interviews; a database of identity documents proffered by applicants to ensure that duplicate documents are not used by multiple applicants; amended application forms that include questions aimed at identifying fraudulent answers and malicious intent; a mechanism to ensure that the applicant is who the applicant claims to be; a process to evaluate the applicant’s likelihood of becoming a positively contributing member of society and the applicant’s ability to make contributions to the national interest; and a mechanism to assess whether or not the applicant has the intent to commit criminal or terrorist acts after entering the United States.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, the Director of National Intelligence, and the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, shall submit to the President an initial report on the progress of this directive within 60 days of the date of this order, a second report within 100 days of the date of this order, and a third report within 200 days of the date of this order.

Sec. 5. Realignment of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for Fiscal Year 2017. (a) The Secretary of State shall suspend the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) for 120 days. During the 120-day period, the Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Secretary of Homeland Security and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall review the USRAP application and adjudication process to determine what additional procedures should be taken to ensure that those approved for refugee admission do not pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States, and shall implement such additional procedures. Refugee applicants who are already in the USRAP process may be admitted upon the initiation and completion of these revised procedures. Upon the date that is 120 days after the date of this order, the Secretary of State shall resume USRAP admissions only for nationals of countries for which the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence have jointly determined that such additional procedures are adequate to ensure the security and welfare of the United States.

(b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual’s country of nationality. Where necessary and appropriate, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall recommend legislation to the President that would assist with such prioritization.

(c) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of nationals of Syria as refugees is detrimental to the interests of the United States and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I have determined that sufficient changes have been made to the USRAP to ensure that admission of Syrian refugees is consistent with the national interest.

(d) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f), I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any such entry until such time as I determine that additional admissions would be in the national interest.

(e) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the admission of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest — including when the person is a religious minority in his country of nationality facing religious persecution, when admitting the person would enable the United States to conform its conduct to a preexisting international agreement, or when the person is already in transit and denying admission would cause undue hardship — and it would not pose a risk to the security or welfare of the United States.

(f) The Secretary of State shall submit to the President an initial report on the progress of the directive in subsection (b) of this section regarding prioritization of claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution within 100 days of the date of this order and shall submit a second report within 200 days of the date of this order.

(g) It is the policy of the executive branch that, to the extent permitted by law and as practicable, State and local jurisdictions be granted a role in the process of determining the placement or settlement in their jurisdictions of aliens eligible to be admitted to the United States as refugees. To that end, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall examine existing law to determine the extent to which, consistent with applicable law, State and local jurisdictions may have greater involvement in the process of determining the placement or resettlement of refugees in their jurisdictions, and shall devise a proposal to lawfully promote such involvement.

Sec. 6. Rescission of Exercise of Authority Relating to the Terrorism Grounds of Inadmissibility. The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Attorney General, consider rescinding the exercises of authority in section 212 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182, relating to the terrorism grounds of inadmissibility, as well as any related implementing memoranda.

Sec. 7. Expedited Completion of the Biometric Entry-Exit Tracking System. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall expedite the completion and implementation of a biometric entry-exit tracking system for all travelers to the United States, as recommended by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the President periodic reports on the progress of the directive contained in subsection (a) of this section. The initial report shall be submitted within 100 days of the date of this order, a second report shall be submitted within 200 days of the date of this order, and a third report shall be submitted within 365 days of the date of this order. Further, the Secretary shall submit a report every 180 days thereafter until the system is fully deployed and operational.

Sec. 8. Visa Interview Security. (a) The Secretary of State shall immediately suspend the Visa Interview Waiver Program and ensure compliance with section 222 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1222, which requires that all individuals seeking a nonimmigrant visa undergo an in-person interview, subject to specific statutory exceptions.

(b) To the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of State shall immediately expand the Consular Fellows Program, including by substantially increasing the number of Fellows, lengthening or making permanent the period of service, and making language training at the Foreign Service Institute available to Fellows for assignment to posts outside of their area of core linguistic ability, to ensure that non-immigrant visa-interview wait times are not unduly affected.

Sec. 9. Visa Validity Reciprocity. The Secretary of State shall review all nonimmigrant visa reciprocity agreements to ensure that they are, with respect to each visa classification, truly reciprocal insofar as practicable with respect to validity period and fees, as required by sections 221(c) and 281 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1201(c) and 1351, and other treatment. If a country does not treat United States nationals seeking nonimmigrant visas in a reciprocal manner, the Secretary of State shall adjust the visa validity period, fee schedule, or other treatment to match the treatment of United States nationals by the foreign country, to the extent practicable.

Sec. 10. Transparency and Data Collection. (a) To be more transparent with the American people, and to more effectively implement policies and practices that serve the national interest, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall, consistent with applicable law and national security, collect and make publicly available within 180 days, and every 180 days thereafter:

(i) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been charged with terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; convicted of terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; or removed from the United States based on terrorism-related activity, affiliation, or material support to a terrorism-related organization, or any other national security reasons since the date of this order or the last reporting period, whichever is later;

(ii) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been radicalized after entry into the United States and engaged in terrorism-related acts, or who have provided material support to terrorism-related organizations in countries that pose a threat to the United States, since the date of this order or the last reporting period, whichever is later; and

(iii) information regarding the number and types of acts of gender-based violence against women, including honor killings, in the United States by foreign nationals, since the date of this order or the last reporting period, whichever is later; and

(iv) any other information relevant to public safety and security as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, including information on the immigration status of foreign nationals charged with major offenses.

(b) The Secretary of State shall, within one year of the date of this order, provide a report on the estimated long-term costs of the USRAP at the Federal, State, and local levels.

Sec. 11. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Posted in Uncategorized | 20 Comments »

Another Day

Posted by Jeff Id on November 10, 2016

So the election went well for America.   For those who live outside of the  US, you won’t understand just how much regulation the largest government on the planet can inflict, nor will it be easily understood just how much tax is being paid by business.  There is a reason manufacturing has left the US in droves.   I haven’t looked up historic records of such things, but the loss of American manufacturing capability has to be the single greatest migration of business in human history.  Again, bulk math drives the situation.  When a situation creates pressure for action the people or businesses respond to those pressures in kind.   If the costs and regulations are higher in one area than another, like gas law, the business will flow from high pressure to low at a non-zero rate only slowed by the frictions caused by such movement.

And flow it has.  From America to the rest of the world.  To business friendly countries like China, Tiawan and now even VietNam.  Countries with leaders who understand math outweighs feelings and oddly enough – Capitalism.   These are people who understand that personal spaces and micro-agression are foolish in their very concept.  They laugh at us – literally! These are folks who get that a building is very unlikely to really harm the planet and far more likely to provide a service to the population.   They know that global warming is not a real threat but is an excellent economic business relocating pressure to use in against people who think it is.  You know, common sense things like that which America’s liberals generally fail to understand.

Despite this flow of business away from America, and in fact completely without regard for said flow, American liberals actively wish to destroy business.  The young generation has been taught that all business is greed and greed is a greater evil than not eating.  See we live in a country where people aren’t starving, they have grown up without even the hint of a day without food.  They live in cities and eat food transported to them from all over the world.  They go to schools where indoctrination and acceptance of liberal belief is primary, feelings are a close second and math and science drop way down the list as useful things to understand.  The acceptance of illogic is foundational to modern American liberalism.   Fakenomics, global warming doom, cow farting is destroying the planet for gods sake, are part and parcel of the system they unwittingly serve.

I’m extremely disappointed with the protests in the cities to Trumps election.   While it was often quoted by the fake media that Clinton’s supporters were more educated than Trump, what was nearly unreported was that Trump even won the now known to be inaccurate polling results among people who made more than 30,000 per year.  I personally define this group as functional people.  The protesters in the cities were obviously a young crowd, and were apparently really focused on Trump racism – because the media here spends much of its time telling people that republicans and conservatives are racist.  After the endless liberal media channels realized that all of their advertising for Clinton, all of their unpaid and unabashed  support for the democrats wasn’t enough to put a crook in office, that is when the lashing out began.   I heard them repeatedly discuss Republican anger and hate, it was the uneducated rural folk who voted, that their anger against the billionaires was the problem.  Never once in the first few hours following the election did they discuss that it was regulation, taxation, or of course the utter lack of common sense espoused by the current Democrat governance.  Certainly not the fact that Hillary was and is a face-palm obvious criminal.

Then there were the protests.  What was most disappointing to me about the protests was the fake claims of Trump racism, because I didn’t know of any examples.  I took a minute to search the internet for examples of racism that Trump has exhibited and quickly found the exact sort of illogical argument the liberals have been so well trained to accept with religious fervor.  From the Huffington post, an article titled – Here Are 13 Examples Of Donald Trump Being Racist.

  • Attacking muslim gold star parents.
    • Muslim is not a race, it is a religion.   The argument with them was an avoidable situation but it certainly cannot be characterized as racist. It is an unhealthy religion too but in today’s liberal-think I’m not allowed to have that opinion but as a sexist republican, I cannot accept a religion which treats women so badly and by its own tenants doesn’t allow them the choice to exit. I also recognize it as an authoritarian government structure rather than a religion. — But again, whether you can figure that out or not, it is not racism to have an argument with a Muslim.
  • He claimed a judge was biased because he was a Mexican
    • So, while making policy which is clearly against Mexico, it is racist to even argue that a Judge from that region might be biased?   I think even the slightest bit of common sense says otherwise.  Oh, and Mexico is a country, not a race so again the argument defies logic.
  • The justice department sued his company twice for housing discrimination.
    • Lawsuits are not racism.  They cannot be by definition.   In business, you get sued, you go to court, you have problems with all kinds of people, you are a continual target for the Federal government.  We don’t know the details of these suits and neither does the post.  Did Trump do something racist in 1972, maybe, but calling the lawsuit an example of racisim is completely bogus.

The article goes on and on with completely nonsensical claims, he didn’t hire ‘mostly minorities’ in one casino, the very definition of minority means less of them. The gave an example of one person who apparently made outrageous claims which the post didn’t even attempt to verify – even with a second opinion.  Trump didn’t disown David Duke quickly enough for them, Trump didn’t use the right politically correct language, he accused a Bridgeport casino of being run by non-Indians mafia types, on and on but outside of the unsubstantiated outrageous claims by some guy who was clearly not a Trump supporter and for all we know doesn’t even exist, they had no actual examples of racisim.

One of the points the article attempted was the condoning of the beating of a black lives matter protester.  Remember the apologies by the political left when they said ‘All Lives Matter’ and the backlash from the African community?  Boy I do.  And the backlash when people say blue lives matter..  Well the Post displayed a short video with the claims that the protester was being kicked on the ground.  Since that time we have learned that the ‘protesters’ were being paid by the Democrat party to deliberately incite violence at these rallys.   A crime for sure, but again the left-wing press is nowhere to be found when that absolutely damning video and email evidence of CRIMINAL activity by the Democrat party was produced.  It is not racism to disagree with these people.

The problem with an objective reading of the Post article, is that none of the 13 examples are Trump racism.  The language is inflammatory which you can tell from the title.  It probably makes readers feel a certain way, but it logically is not racism.

In direct contrast, the liberal party of America is openly racist.  Black lives matter might have started with a good thought but it is nothing but an anti-white hate group which is more violent, more popular, and more numerous than the also=evil KKK itself.  The group is openly anti-white, openly anti-law and represents an evil sickness within the African community.  The KKK and Black lives matter are equal groups in all things racist.  Images and video of white people being beaten, abused and attacked for the sole crime of being white are quite common, and instead of rejecting the hate, liberals embrace it even inviting them to the white house because it is a popular movement. And because white people have pale skin.

The liberal party of America is also sexist.  The LGBT community leads the way in this with anti-marriage, anti-male rhetoric of the worst kind.  What is worse is that the worst of these groups are openly supported by the liberal media as a solution to a problem which largely doesn’t exist.  While decrying Hillary’s loss as sexism, the media openly campaigned for a Woman simply because she was female and a black man simply because he was black.  While you may agree that we need a woman in the White house, the very statement is sexist BY definition!  While a black man is in the white house, promoting him simply because he was black was 100% racist, and much of the liberal media did exactly that in both cases.  I was raised that all people are equal under the law, not that some are more equal than others and that IS how I chose to live my life.

Why isn’t the goal simply finding the best person with the best qualities is beyond me.  Like all of my friends, we don’t care one whit what color a persons skin is.  We don’t care what sort of hardware they hold in their pants.  I liked Fiorina (a woman) first and then Carson a very smart doctor who, if you give a crap about such things, also happened to have black skin. Contrast that with the liberals in power promoted a woman’s candidacy over any shred of common sense simply due to the SEX she represented.  They wanted to repeat the feat they performed with a black man, so the so-smart yet math-ignorant elitists in media, who would control rather than report, espoused the virtues of A CROOK in public for nearly two years.   Hillary Clinton is a liar, a cheat, a theif and would sell the United States of America at the drop of a hat — because she already has.  The media directly cheated the public to do so as well, handing Hillary debate questions (we will likely find out more about that in the future), coordinating with the DNC on what questions to ask Trump, actively colluding to destroy Sanders.  All of which they did while holding their heads aloof and pretending that it was simply reporting.  It is not only CNN which has this problem.

So my Trump voting “problem” these left-wing fools can’t understand, is NOT sexist, it is NOT racist, it is not anger against billionaires, it is not the desperation of a failing middle class individual that drives our decision, and nor is it some confused hillbilly in a pickup truck with two teeth and a dog —– it IS logic.  A skill that the left-wing schools in America have successfully removed from the curriculum’s of our universities and high schools.  How that particular bit isn’t obvious to the media, is as shocking to me as not being able to point out the sun on a clear day at noon.

So watching those young folk storm the streets in protest makes me sick to my stomach.  The evils they represent are completely unknown to them.  They are oblivious to the hunger and anguish which will be created by a collapsing economy under the pressures of an all powerful central government.  The lassez fair shoulder shrugs they give when  you talk about manufacturing leaving the country combined with the angry vitriol over climate change doom when one is in evidence and the other is not, are just another symptom of their immense ignorance.  I very much fear for America because while we might have a supreme court with a bit of common sense in the future, we simply cannot overcome that much stupid in the long term.   When a crook can garner that much of the vote, what hope do we have?  When people have their heads up their asses, literally protest and cry as that same crook is not put into the highest position of the country, how can any other form of logic be expected to form within their minds.

It cannot.

But for now I will relax a little while understanding the really good news; that our supreme courts eventual transformation into the extreme court, that increased tax rates on the highest taxed businesses in the world, and that increases in the endless draconian regulation of the US federal, state and local governments

…… won’t be happening today!!




Posted in Uncategorized | 31 Comments »

FIB says Clinton Not Guilty — Id’s Predicted November Surprise Comes True!!

Posted by Jeff Id on November 6, 2016

Just one post ago. Like Nostradamus.

Hell, I was having fun because for a short time the other day I couldn’t find a different angle as to why Comey would have the FBI working in shifts.  It seemed real enough to be crazy but so is everything else.  Despite the fact that he only had 30,000 emails before and it took months to come to conclusion, with 650,000 emails the FBI reviewed them in a few days.

Comey has decided that Hillary doesn’t deserve charges — better than a pardon and it just happens to have occurred with 2 days left.

hahaha.  My Id is smarter than the FBI.

The shortest investigation in history….AND SOON THE 100% COMPLETE EXONERATION OF CLINTON PER COMEY!

Watch the id..

Posted in Uncategorized | 19 Comments »

Bad Trump – Open Thread

Posted by Jeff Id on November 6, 2016

So She is a crook, an absolutely guilty criminal with behaviors beyond treasonous.  She has collected money from foreign governments, spent the money on her own family, she went from “broke” to a quarter billion in cash since her husband retired.  Clinton will be beholden to these foreign investors 100%.  Imagine if she doesn’t listen to Morocco, the KING will simply threaten to release her emails.  Quatar, Saudi’s, Egypt, Russia, on and on, it is so blatantly obvious, why people can’t figure that out, is beyond me.

In May, Petty Officer First Class Kristian Saucier plead guilty to and is currently serving a one year sentence in federal prison for violation of the Espionage Act, though no charge of espionage was ever filed. His crime, he used his cellphone to take 6 photographs while he was in a “classified area of a submarine,” the USS Alexandria.Fox News Insider.

She did so much more yet hasn’t been charged there are hundreds of examples of Saucier’s plight.  As an aside, Comey is complicit in this, he created it when he buckled to political pressure earlier this year and I don’t expect him to come through this time either.

Her husband is an accused rapist, molester and hasn’t changed course. She’s protected him and as a lawyer as an actual child rapist (she believed was guilty) so the argument that Trump is bad to women doesn’t make sense.  Make it here on this thread if you want.

My point is  — what about Trump.   I’ve heard people say how bad he is dozens of times yet they are completely non-specific.  What do people see that makes Trump anywhere near as bad as Clinton.

What I see is a man with a lack of detail.  I see someone who knows how to negotiate and it doesn’t start with — you are not paying for the wall — you must start with the extreme scenario and work your way to the middle.   Bomb them to hell!!!  etc..  Every position he has articulated comes from that perspective.  Most haven’t had the opportunity to negotiate anything serious that affects more than their own lives.  How are you supposed to act when facing something which affects jobs, the economy, safety etc… I get that he scares people but that is what negotiations do, they scare you into a better position for them.

It is interesting that we are so PC that our emotions have now taken precedent over actual acts.   Microagression is becoming a non-statute crime which has forced some from their educations.   They must conform or they lose (fill in random leverage based variable here). Where is the REQUIRED lack of confrontation going?

But beyond his inarticulateness, what I want to know is what people think is so bad about Trump that an absolute criminal is better!

I will answer questions only, when I have time.  Feel free to bash Trump to your hearts content.

Posted in Uncategorized | 14 Comments »

The November Surprise

Posted by Jeff Id on November 2, 2016

So each election for president in the last several cycles has include revelations by the liberal media that the conservative has done something bad— in the last 3 days.  Romney apparently hates dogs, Bush had a DUI etc…

You would think that they would bring this crap earlier but it isn’t as effective when a person can explain what actually happened.  I was expecting another rough Trump tape – nothing compared to William Clinton.  I was expecting some tax thing or whatever, what I wasn’t expecting was an immediate and unqualified exoneration from the FBI.

However, I just learned that the FBI has “chosen” people working in shifts to look through these NEW emails.

IMO, it, that, zhe, she, whatever, will be exonerated falsely again before Tuesday next week.    Comey is still clean in that case and Clinton gets the final push.

Why else would the FBI work in shifts?


Posted in Uncategorized | 19 Comments »

Donna Brazile’s Lies Continue… Clinton Corruption Also Continues

Posted by Jeff Id on October 31, 2016

It seems obvious that the data the FBI has from Weiner and Huma is absolutely damning.  Comey had to come out with it now or he would be culpable.  Otherwise he could just duck the issue until later.  It was already obvious and were WikiLeaks not releasing details behind the scenes, we wouldn’t have enough data to know how corrupt Hillary is and how corrupt the Democrat party is.

On that issue, I fully beleived that in the first debate Hillary was passed the question about cybersecurity.  She was too quick on the answer and her answer fit the question too perfectly considering the major criminal issues she faces already.   I literally cringed that the moderator asked something so biased in Hillary’s favor but it was the tailoring of the response that made me duck.

Then we had Democratic National Committee boss and former CNN contributor Donna Brazile’s name come out in the Wiki releases stating that she shared the questions.  She denied it 100%, then we learned that the checksum for the email was perfect so we know Donna is a liar!!  She made no comment but today, we find out that she did it another time and actually offered additional questions in the future.  Her email is here where she replies that she will send more along with the death penalty question already discussed.

Hillary’s group could have denied the questions being offered.  They could have responded that it wasn’t fair to the other candidates.  Hill is in on this one too, not just crazy Donna.  CNN is also guilty because they were intentionally sharing questions with what we know was their favorite candidate.  I for one am certain that this behavior continued throughout the debate cycle — at least until Fox.

The renewed FBI investigation couldn’t happen to a nicer person.   If she gets elected, we could go right into an actual constitutional crisis but that doesn’t stop the nut-jobs I heard on the radio claiming that climate change was so dangerous we HAVE to vote for a crook.    They literally claimed that climate change was more important than criminality of the candidate.

Love it!




Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments »